Analysis of the selection of propagation models from outside into the building at 1800 MHz and 2100 MHz
Keywords:Path losses; propagation model; propagation from outside into the building; 3GPP Model; Winner Model; COST231 model
Wireless internet service in educational buildings plays a crucial role in telecommunications for the knowledge sharing process. Therefore, various factors that may limit internet services coverage in the building should be eliminated or reduced. One such factor is path losses. Path losses are caused by multiple obstacles between the transmitting and receiving antennas. The problem of path losses in the education building can be solved by providing signal booster devices or Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi). But not all college buildings have such tools. Besides, WiFi devices also have limitations on bandwidth and the number of users. Thus, mobile communication devices or smartphones located inside the education buildings still need internet service coverage from the transmitter antenna outside the building. An accurate propagation model is required so that the transmitter antenna outside the building can provide internet service coverage to the inside of the building. This paper had been analyzed the selection of propagation models using three validation formulas, namely Mean Error (ME), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Standard Deviation Error (SDE). This paper used several propagation models, namely the 3GPP Model, Winner+ Model, and COST231 Model. Based on the analysis of calculation and measurement data, it is known that the COST231 model is the most accurate because it has the lowest ME, RMSE, and SDE values.
A. R. Abubar, Usman, Sitopu, M. W., Sihombing, P. M., Hidayat, J., & Sahputra, A. (2020). Microstrip Antenna Design with Left-Handed Metamaterial (LHM) for Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B). 103–106. https://doi.org/10.1109/ELTICOM50775.2020.9230510
Castro, G., Feick, R., Rodriguez, M., Valenzuela, R., & Chizhik, D. (2017). Outdoor-to-Indoor Empirical Path loss Models : Analysis for Pico and Femto Cells in Street Canyons. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2337(c), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/LWC.2017.2715169
Degli-esposti, V., Lu, J. S., Wu, J. N., Zhu, J. J., Blaha, J. A., Vitucci, E. M., Fuschini, F., & Barbiroli, M. (2017). A Semi-Deterministic Model for Outdoor-to-Indoor Prediction in Urban Areas. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Letters, 16, 2412–2415.
K. Arana, L. E. M. and M. R. A. (2020). Outdoor-to-Indoor Propagation at sub-6 GHz band: Measurements and Analysis in Multi-Storey Environment. 2020 IEEE Latin-American Conference on Communications (LATINCOM), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/LATINCOM50620.2020.9282337
Kristem, V., Sangodoyin, S., Bas, C. U., Käske, M., Lee, J., Schneider, C., Sommerkorn, G., Zhang, C. J., Thomä, R. S., & Molisch, A. F. (2017). 3D MIMO Outdoor-to-Indoor Propagation Channel Measurement. IEEE Transaction on Wireless Communications, 16(7), 4600–4613.
Lee, J. (2021). Cluster-Based Millimeter-Wave Outdoor-to-Indoor Propagation Characteristics Based on 32 GHz Measurement Analysis. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 20, 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2020.3040477
Lofi, D., & Houcine, O. (2017). Empirical Model Optimization Using Nelder-Mead Algorithm for Mobile Communication in Suburban and Rural Area.
MacCartney, G. R., & Rappaport, T. S. (2017). Rural macrocell path loss models for millimeter-wave wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 35(7), 1663–1677. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2017.2699359
P. M. Sihombing, H. A. Samosir, L. T. H., Sitopu, M. W., Margolang, J., & J. Hidayat. (2020). Microstrip Antenna Design Using Meander Line Technique for Communication between Pilot and Air Traffic Controller in VHF A/G Band. 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1109/ELTICOM50775.2020.9230499
Pinem, M., Zulfin, M., Suherman, S., Sihombing, P. M., & Rezkika, S. I. (2018). Characterization of Outdoor to Indoor Propagation in Urban Area by Using A Combination of COST231 Walfisch-Ikegami and COST231 Multiwall Models in 1800 Mhz and 2100 Mhz. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7, 698–702. website: www.sciencepubco.com/index.php/IJET
Rodriguez, I., & Nguyen, H. C. (2016). An Empirical Outdoor-to-Indoor Path Loss Model from below 6 GHz to cm-Wave Frequency Bands. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 1225(c), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2016.2633787
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communication AB. (2009). Sony Ericsson W995/W995a/W995u WalkmanTM User Guide.
Svistunov, A. (2017). Validation of Empirical Radiowave Propagation Models for Diagnostics of Intrasystem EMC and Electromagnetic Safety of Microcellular Radio Networks. International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 0–5.
Tongyu communication. (2007). Base Station Antenna Product Catalogue. https://doi.org/Product
TR 38.901, 3GPP. (2017). Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz: Vol. 14.0.0. ETSI.
Yu, Y., Liu, Y., Lu, W., & Zhu, H. (2017). Measurement and empirical modeling of root mean square delay spread in indoor femtocells scenarios. IET Communications, 11(13), 2125–2131. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2017.0410
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Panangian Mahadi Sihombing, Maksum Pinem, Sri Indah Rezkika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.