Comparison of Evaluation and Selection of SmartPhones Recommended AHP, Weight Sum Model, and Weight Product

Authors

  • Akmaludin Universitas Nusa Mandiri, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Erene Gernaria Sihombing Universitas Nusa Mandiri, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Linda Sari Dewi Universitas Nusa Mandiri, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Rinawati Universitas Nusa Mandiri, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Ester Arisawati Universitas Nusa Mandiri, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

10.33395/sinkron.v7i4.11366

Keywords:

AHP, Evaluation, Priority, Selection, Weight Product, Weight Sum Model.

Abstract

Advances in SmartPhone technology in the current era, make many users have more and more considerations to have a SmartPhone because there are many criteria that must be compared. The purpose of this paper is to give careful consideration for every user to have an optimal SmartPhone. Problems that are felt by many users as users find it difficult to make choices for electronic goods in the form of this SmartPhone. Thus, a number of methods are needed that are able to give careful and intelligent consideration to the user in order to obtain the acquisition of the electronic goods in the form of the SmartPhone. In short, the method that can be used to evaluate and select SmartPhones is the Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP) which functions as a weight determination, while the Weight Sum Model (WSM) and Weight Product (WP) act as a ranking system. This method will be used to provide an optimal comparison value for SmartPhone products with decisions that can be seen based on the priority of the WSM vector and the WP vector, then based on the average of the two methods provide decision support results. The first position is Xiaomi Mi Max with a weight of 175 and followed sequentially onwards by Asus Zenfone Max ZC550KL (174), Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime (124), Lenovo Vibe Shot (117), Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML (113), Xiaomi Mi 4C (108 ), Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus (101), and finally the Samsung Galaxy A3 (89). Thus the combination method between the AHP, WSM and WP methods can provide the best solution with optimal results for decision-making support for comparison evaluation and selection in the form of a SmartPhone with optimal results.

GS Cited Analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

kmaludin, A. (2017). Sensitivitas Keputusan terhadap Nilai Eigenvector Dengan Pendekatan Weight Product Model. Bina Insani ICT Journal, 4(2), 111–120.

Akmaludin, Akmaludin, Hartati, T., Purwanto, H., & Sukendar, T. (2020). The Best Selection of Programmers in Generation 4 . 0 Using AHP and ELECTRE Elimination Methods. 0–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1477/3/032001

Akmaludin dkk, A. (2017). Weight Average Model ( WAM ) For Notebook Selections. 4(1), 9–20.

Ali, S. M. (2012). an Analytical Hierarchical Process for Prioritising the Safety Management Elements for a Manufacturing Organization in Bangladesh. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 4(2), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v4i2.78

Aminudin, N., Sundari, E., K, S., Deepalakshmi, P., . F., Irviani, R., & Maseleno, A. (2018). Weighted Product and Its Application to Measure Employee Performance. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.26), 102. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.26.14362

Beshah, B., & Kitaw, D. (2013). Ahp Application in a Financial Institution. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 5(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v5i1.135

Dave, H. K., Desai, K. P., & Raval, H. K. (2012). a Decision Support System for Tool Electrode Selection for Electro Discharge Machining Process Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 4(2), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v4i2.131

Gemiharto, I. (2015). Teknologi 4G-Lte Dan Tantangan Konvergensi Media Di Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 3(2), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.vol3n2.10

Gumay, L. A., Purwandari, B., Raharjo, T., Wahyudi, A., & Purwaningsih, M. (2020). Identifying Critical Success Factors for Information Technology Projects with an Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Case of a Telco Company in Indonesia. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379310.3379326

Hapsoro, B. B., Palupiningdyah, & Slamet, A. (2019). Peran Digital Marketing sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Omset. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 23(2), 117–120.

Imanuwelita, V., Regasari, R., Putri, M., & Amalia, F. (2018). Penentuan Kelayakan Lokasi Usaha Franchise Menggunakan Metode AHP dan VIKOR. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 2(1), 122–132.

Khairina, D. M., Pramukti, I. C., Hatta, H. R., & Maharani, S. (2021). Model Pengambilan Keputusan Pemilihan Bibit Unggul Sapi Bali Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 8(5), 879. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.2021853512

Lipovetsky, S. (2013). the Supermatrix Eigenproblem: an Interpretation of the Priority Vectors in the Analytic Network Process. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 5(1), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v5i1.132

Mazumdar, A. (2009). Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making ( MCDM ) Approaches on Teachers ’ Performance Evaluation and Appraisal Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making ( MCDM ) Approaches on Teachers ’ Performance Evaluation and Appraisal. In Mechanical Engineering. National Institute Of Technology Rourkela.

Ortiz-Barrios, M., & López-Meza, P. (2016). An Integrated AHP-VIKOR Approach for Market Selection Process. International Journal of Control Theory and Applications, 9(44), 141–150. http://serialsjournals.com/serialjournalmanager/pdf/1494316153.pdf

Rapitasari, D. (2016). Digital marketing Berbasis Aplikasi Sebagai Strategi Meningkatkan Kepuasaan Pelanggan. Jurnal Cakrawala, 10(2), 107–112. http://www.cakrawalajournal.org/index.php/cakrawala/article/view/36

Saaty, T. L. (2009). An Essay on How Judgment and Measurement are Different in Science and in Decision Making. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1(1), 61–62. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v1i1.14

Saaty, T. L. (2010). The Eigenvector In Lay Language 2 . What we learn when we have measurement. 2(2), 163–169.

Siregar, M. N. H. (2017). Implementasi Weight Product Model (Wpm) Dalam Menentukan Pemilihan Sepeda Motor Sport Berbasis Spk. Klik - Kumpulan Jurnal Ilmu Komputer, 4(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.20527/klik.v4i1.72

Solikhun, S. (2017). Perbandingan Metode Weighted Product Dan Weighted Sum Model Dalam Pemilihan Perguruan Swasta Terbaik Jurusan Komputer. Klik - Kumpulan Jurnal Ilmu Komputer, 4(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.20527/klik.v4i1.75

Technologies, M. (2014). Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Volume: 4 – Issue: 1 – January - 2014. 185–215.

Valasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. (2016). An Analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 5(4), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13748-016-0093-1

Downloads


Crossmark Updates

How to Cite

Akmaludin, A., Sihombing , E. G. ., Dewi, L. S. ., Rinawati , R. ., & Arisawati , E. . (2022). Comparison of Evaluation and Selection of SmartPhones Recommended AHP, Weight Sum Model, and Weight Product. Sinkron : Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 6(4), 2160-2169. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v7i4.11366

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 4 (2022): Article Research: Volume 6 Number 4, October 2022

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Akmaludin, Erene Gernaria Sihombing , Linda Sari Dewi, Rinawati , Ester Arisawati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>