Decision Making for the Best Hospital Evaluation Using the AHP-COPRAS Method
DOI:
10.33395/sinkron.v8i4.12313Keywords:
AHP, COPRAS, Hospital, Multi-criteria,Utilitas.Abstract
The assessment of the Hospital is very important in providing a rating as a measure of accreditation. Hospitals should provide the best service to visiting patients. The purpose of this study is to provide a ranking of hospitals that should be a measure of the appropriateness of a hospital as seen from a number of criteria as a true assessment. The criteria used as a barometer for the assessment consist of ten criteria, namely Administrative Services, Doctor Services, Pharmaceutical Installation Services, Cleanliness, Convenience, Security, Number of Administrative Personnel, Number of Pharmaceutical Personnel, Administrative Complaints, and Pharmacy Installation Complaints. The scoring system that will be applied uses the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method as a determinant of the weight of each criterion and the Fuzzy assessment uses the Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) method. The two methods will be collaborated as a determinant in the process of giving a rating system to the ten hospitals that are included in the priority assessment. The results obtained from the ranking process of the two AHP and COPRAS methods are seen from the acquisition of the utility value produced, the largest value obtained from the utility gives the best rating. The utility value is obtained from the total assessment of a number of criteria for each hospital and the largest utility rating does not exceed one. The highest value of the utility generated by the RS10 alternative with a utility scale of 0.098 as the best value.
Downloads
References
Abidin. (2016). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan BPJS Kesehatan terhadap Kepuasan Pasien di Puskesmas Cempaka Kota Parepare Effect of BPJS Health Service Quality on Patient Satisfaction in Cempae Community Health Center , Parepare City. Jurnal Mkm, 12(2), 70–75.
Akmaludin, A., Hartati, T., Purwanto, H., & Sukendar, T. (2020). The Best Selection of Programmers in Generation 4 . 0 Using AHP and ELECTRE Elimination Methods The Best Selection of Programmers in Generation 4 . 0 Using AHP and ELECTRE Elimination Methods. Journal Conference Series, 0–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1477/3/032001
Algunmeeyn, A., Alrawashdeh, M., & Alhabashneh, H. (2020). Benefits of applying for hospital accreditation: The perspective of staff. Journal of Nursing Management, 28(6), 1233–1240. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13066
Ali, Y., Haroon, M., Abdullah, M., & Khan, A. U. (2019). The best manufacturing procedure for the commercial production of urea: Using AHP based topsis. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 11(3), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v11i3.636
Alonso, J. A., & Lamata, M. T. (2006). Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: a new approach. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 14(4), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488506004114
Bagga, P., Joshi, A., & Hans, R. (2019). QoS based Web Service Selection and Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 5(4), 113. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2017.12.001
Cholil, S. R., & Setyawan, M. A. (2021). Metode COPRAS untuk Menentukan Kain Terbaik dalam Pembuatan Pakaian pada Butik Batik Hatta Semarang. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 8(6), 1169. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.2021863584
de Castro-Pardo, M., de la Fuente-Cabrero, C., Laguna-Sánchez, P., & Pérez-Rodríguez, F. (2019). Combining AHP and goal programming in the context of the assessment of e-learning. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 11(3), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v11i3.630
dos Santos, M., de Araújo Costa, I. P., & Gomes, C. F. S. (2021). Multicriteria Decision-Making In The Selection Of Warships: A New Approach To The Ahp Method. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 13(1), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v13i1.833
Fatima, T., Malik, S. A., & Shabbir, A. (2018). Hospital healthcare service quality, patient satisfaction and loyalty: An investigation in context of private healthcare systems. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 35(6), 1195–1214. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-02-2017-0031
Ganguly, A., & Kumar, C. (2019). Evaluating supply chain resiliency strategies in the Indian pharmaceutical sector: A Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP) approach. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 11(2), 153–180. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v11i2.620
Ginting, G., Alvita, S., Karim, A., Syahrizal, M., & Khairani Daulay, N. (2020). Penerapan Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) Dalam Penentuan Kepolisian Sektor Terbaik. Jurnal Sains Komputer & Informatika (J-SAKTI, 4(2), 616–631.
Goswami, S. S., & Mitra, S. (2020). Selecting the best mobile model by applying AHP-COPRAS and AHP-ARAS decision making methodology. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 4(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2019.8.004
Kondasani, R. K. R., & Panda, R. K. (2016). Service Quality Perception and Behavioural Intention: A Study of Indian Private Hospitals. Journal of Health Management, 18(1), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972063416639168
Organ, A., & Yalçın, E. (2016). Performance Evaluation Of Research Assistants By Copras Method. European Scientific Journal, 7881(August), 1857–7881.
Suryandartiwi, W. (2020). Pengaruh Complaint Handling terhadap Patient Loyalty Melalui Satisfaction Complaint Handling di RS Penyelenggara BPJS Yogyakarta. Jurnal Administrasi Rumah Sakit, 1(1), 34–46.
Sutoto, S., & Utarini, A. (2019). Mendorong riset dan berbagi pengalaman untuk peningkatan mutu dan keselamatan pasien di rumah sakit. The Journal of Hospital Accreditation, 1(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.35727/jha.v1i1.18
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Akmaludin, Adhi Dharma Suriyanto, Nandang Iriadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.