Simplifying Complexity: Linearization Method for Partial Least Squares Regression

Authors

  • Herlin Simanullang Postgraduated Mathematics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Sutarman Department of Mathematics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Open Darnius Department of Mathematics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

10.33395/sinkron.v8i3.12754

Keywords:

Partial least squares regression, Linearization Method, Orthogonal Score Algorithm

Abstract

This research investigates Romera’s local linearization approach as a variance prediction method in partial least squares (PLS) regression. By addressing limitations in the original PLS regression formula, the local linearization approach aims to improve accuracy and stability in variance predictions. Extensive simulations are conducted to assess the method's performance, demonstrating its superiority over traditional algebraic methods and showcasing its computational advantages, particularly with a large number of predictors. Additionally, the study introduces a novel computational technique utilizing bootstrap parameters, enhancing computational stability and robustness. Overall, the research provides valuable insights into the local linearization approach's effectiveness, guiding researchers and practitioners in selecting more reliable and efficient regression modeling techniques.

GS Cited Analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sutarman, Department of Mathematics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

 

 

Open Darnius, Department of Mathematics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

 

 

References

Guckenheimer, J., & Holmes, P. (2013). Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and bifurcations of vector fields (Vol. 42). Springer Science & Business Media.

Haff, L. R. (1979). An identity for the Wishart distribution with applications. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 9(4), 531–544.

Helland, I. S. (1988). On the structure of partial least squares regression. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 17(2), 581–607.

Mahfouf, J.-F. (1999). Influence of physical processes on the tangent-linear approximation. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 51(2), 147–166.

Martens, H., & Naes, T. (1992). Multivariate calibration. John Wiley & Sons.

Romera, R. (2010). Prediction intervals in Partial Least Squares regression via a new local linearization approach. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 103(2), 122–128.

Wentzell, P. D., Cleary, C. S., & Kompany-Zareh, M. (2017). Improved modeling of multivariate measurement errors based on the Wishart distribution. Analytica Chimica Acta, 959, 1–14.

Zhang, L., & Garcia-Munoz, S. (2009). A comparison of different methods to estimate prediction uncertainty using Partial Least Squares (PLS): A practitioner’s perspective. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 97(2), 152–158.

Downloads


Crossmark Updates

How to Cite

Simanullang, H., Sutarman, S., & Darnius, O. (2023). Simplifying Complexity: Linearization Method for Partial Least Squares Regression. Sinkron : Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 8(3), 1811-1820. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i3.12754

Most read articles by the same author(s)