Comparison of Smartphone Technology using AHP, ELECTRE, and PROMETHEE Methods


  • Akmaludin STMIK Nusa Mandiri Jakarta
  • Adhi Dharma Suriyanto Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Nandang Iriadi Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, Indonesia
  • Kudiantoro Widianto Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, Jakarta, Indonesia




AHP, ELECTRE, Multi-criteria, PROMETHEE, SmartPhone.


The progress of smartphone technology is now very rapid, supported by many renewable features, even many users are competing to get the latest products without regard to the costs that have been incurred. The problem that arises is that it is increasingly difficult to select technology-based products with many criteria. The purpose of writing this paper is to provide the best solution for selecting technology-based products with multi-criteria to suit user needs by taking into account the costs incurred effectively and the use of contradictory multi-criteria applications. The presence of technology products always has many criteria that make it more difficult for users to choose products as the right choice according to their needs, thus the right method is needed as a solution to obtain technology-based products such as smartphones. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is used for the evaluation and selection process. This AHP method will collaborate with the ELECTRE and PROMETHEE methods as a comparison solution for smartphone product selection. The resulting comparison will be an applied model for smartphone selection that produces the best decision-making support according to user needs. The results of the collaborative implementation process of the ELECTRE and PROMETHEE methods provide a decision on the rating system. The collaborative application of the AHP method to the ELECTRE and PROMETHEE methods provides optimal decision support for the selection process, so that this can be used as a comparison material in making decisions regarding the selection of smartphones as technology-based products.

GS Cited Analysis


Download data is not yet available.


Akinlalu, A. A., Olayanju, G. M., Adiat, K. A. N., & Omosuyi, G. O. (2021). Mineralisation potential assessment using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) modeling technique: A case study of Ilesha schist belt, southwestern Nigeria. Results in Geophysical Sciences, 7(January), 100026.

Akmaludin, A., Hartati, T., Purwanto, H., & Sukendar, T. (2020). The Best Selection of Programmers in Generation 4 . 0 Using AHP and ELECTRE Elimination Methods The Best Selection of Programmers in Generation 4 . 0 Using AHP and ELECTRE Elimination Methods. Journal Conference Series, 0–7.

Akram, M., Luqman, A., Carlos, J., & Alcantud, R. (2022). An integrated ELECTRE-I approach for risk evaluation with hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy information. Expert Systems With Applications, 200(May 2021), 116945.

Akram, M., Noreen, U., & Deveci, M. (2023). Enhanced ELECTRE II method with 2-tuple linguistic m-polar fuzzy sets for multi-criteria group decision making. Expert Systems with Applications, 213(PC), 119237.

Apostolou, B., & Hassell, J. M. (2002). Note on consistency ratio: A reply. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 35(9–10), 1081–1083.

Aschenbrenner, M. (2012). Logarithms of iteration matrices, and proof of a conjecture by Shadrin and Zvonkine. Journal of Combinatorial Theory. Series A, 119(3), 627–654.

Corrente, S., Greco, S., & SŁowiński, R. (2013). Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process with ELECTRE and PROMETHEE. Omega (United Kingdom), 41(5), 820–846.

da Cunha, R. A., Rangel, L. A. D., Rudolf, C. A., & Santos, L. dos. (2022). A decision support approach employing the PROMETHEE method and risk factors for critical supply assessment in large-scale projects. Operations Research Perspectives, 9(April), 100238.

Erdogan, S. A., Šaparauskas, J., & Turskis, Z. (2017). Decision Making in Construction Management: AHP and Expert Choice Approach. Procedia Engineering, 172, 270–276.

Hamidah, M., Mohd Hasmadi, I., Chua, L. S. L., Yong, W. S. Y., Lau, K. H., Faridah-Hanum, I., & Pakhriazad, H. Z. (2022). Development of a protocol for Malaysian Important Plant Areas criterion weights using Multi-criteria Decision Making - Analytical Hierarchy Process (MCDM-AHP). Global Ecology and Conservation, 34(October 2021), e02033.

Iyengar, K., Upadhyaya, G. K., Vaishya, R., & Jain, V. (2020). COVID-19 and applications of smartphone technology in the current pandemic. Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews, 14(5), 733–737.

John, B., McCreary, C., & Roberts, A. (2022). Smartphone technology for communications between clinicians – A scoping review. Journal of Dentistry, 122(April), 104112.

Lacruz, M., León-Saavedra, F., Petrovic, S., & Rodríguez-Piazza, L. (2021). Extended eigenvalues of composition operators. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 504(2), 125427.

Lopes, A. P. F., Muñoz, M. M., & Alarcón-Urbistondo, P. (2018). Regional tourism competitiveness using the PROMETHEE approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 73(December 2017), 1–13.

Marhavilas, P. K., Filippidis, M., Koulinas, G. K., & Koulouriotis, D. E. (2022). Safety-assessment by hybridizing the MCDM/AHP & HAZOP-DMRA techniques through safety’s level colored maps: Implementation in a petrochemical industry. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61(9), 6959–6977.

Ogonowski, P. (2022). Integrated AHP and TOPSIS Method in the Comparative Analysis of the Internet Activities. Procedia Computer Science, 207, 4409–4418.

Pagliuca, M. M., & Scarpato, D. (2014). The Olive Oil Sector: A Comparison between Consumers and “experts” Choices by the Sensory Analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 17(14), 221–230.

Palczewski, K., & Sałabun, W. (2019). Influence of various normalization methods in PROMETHEE II: An empirical study on the selection of the airport location. Procedia Computer Science, 159, 2051–2060.

Panchal, S., & Shrivastava, A. K. (2022). Landslide hazard assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP): A case study of National Highway 5 in India. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(3), 101626.

Radomska-Zalas, A. (2022). The AHP method in the optimization of the epoxidation of allylic alcohols. Procedia Computer Science, 207, 456–464.

Song, J., Yao, J., & Yuan, W. (2022). Recent advances on eigenvalues of matrix-valued stochastic processes. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 188, 104847.

Xu, Y., & Wang, H. (2013). Eigenvector method, consistency test and inconsistency repairing for an incomplete fuzzy preference relation. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(7), 5171–5183.

Zhang, R., Gao, C., Chen, X., Li, F., Yi, D., & Wu, Y. (2023). Genetic algorithm optimised Hadamard product method for inconsistency judgement matrix adjustment in AHP and automatic analysis system development. Expert Systems with Applications, 211(August 2022), 118689.

Zhao, Y., & Deng, C. (2022). Analysis of project benefit of solar energy collection and irrigation system based on AHP. Energy Reports, 8, 122–130.


Crossmark Updates

How to Cite

Akmaludin, A., Suriyanto , A. D. ., Iriadi, N., & Widianto, K. . (2024). Comparison of Smartphone Technology using AHP, ELECTRE, and PROMETHEE Methods. Sinkron : Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 8(2), 734-747.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>