Decision Making Model for Temple Revitalization in Bali Using Fuzzy-SMARTER Combination Method
DOI:
10.33395/sinkron.v9i1.13177Keywords:
Combined Method, Decision Making Model, Fuzzy, SMARTER, Temple RevitalizationAbstract
Bali is dominated by Hindus and temples as places of worship. Revitalization is carried out periodically in order to preserve the temple. Many factors are taken into consideration in revitalization decisions so that they can be approved by a group or government. Through the decision-making model of temple revitalization in Bali, the entire complexity of decision-making factors can be integrated so as to produce an objective priority ranking of improvements as supporting data for a revitalization decision. The combination of fuzzy sets and the SMARTER (Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Exploiting Rank) method can help solve unstructured problems in determining temple revitalization decisions. The calculation between the Alternative sacred building and the complexity factor criteria with a final value of more than 0.5 is included as a revitalization priority suggestion.
Downloads
References
Aristamy, I. G. A. A. M., Sudipa, I. G. I., Yanti, C. P., Pratistha, I., & Waas, V. D. (2021). An Application of a Decision Support System for Senior High School Scholarship with Modified MADM Method. 2021 6th International Conference on New Media Studies (CONMEDIA), 54–59.
Bošković, S., Švadlenka, L., Jovčić, S., Dobrodolac, M., Simić, V., & Bačanin, N. (2023). An Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalization (AROMAN)–A Case Study of the Electric Vehicle Selection Problem. IEEE Access.
Brokerhof, A. W., van Leijen, R., & Gersonius, B. (2023). Protecting Built Heritage against Flood: Mapping Value Density on Flood Hazard Maps. Water (Switzerland), 15(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/w15162950
Delfiner, A. (2019). A Vedic land: Pulau dewata, island of the gods. Journal of Maharishi Vedic Research Institute, 10, 21–41.
Dell’ovo, M., Dell’anna, F., Simonelli, R., & Sdino, L. (2021). Enhancing the cultural heritage through adaptive reuse. A multicriteria approach to evaluate the Castello Visconteo in Cusago (Italy). Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(8), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084440
Dwijendra, N. K. A. (2020). Identity struggle perspective in car-shaped shrine in paluang temple, nusa penida bali, Indonesia. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(4), 5579–5591. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I4/PR201653
Edwards, W., & Barron, F. H. (1994). Smarts and smarter: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. In Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (Vol. 60, Issue 3, pp. 306–325). https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1087
Elia, A., Fadilah, A., Fitriani, M., & Suryani, P. (2021). Perbandingan Metode SMART, SMARTER dan TOPSIS dalam Pemilihan Lokasi Toko Serba Murah Pulau Kijang: Comparison of SMART, SMARTER AND TOPSIS …. … : Indonesian Journal of …, 1(October), 170–176. https://journal.irpi.or.id/index.php/malcom/article/view/140%0Ahttps://journal.irpi.or.id/index.php/malcom/article/download/140/71
Esangbedo, M. O., Xue, J., Bai, S., & Esangbedo, C. O. (2022). Relaxed Rank Order Centroid Weighting MCDM Method With Improved Grey Relational Analysis for Subcontractor Selection: Photothermal Power Station Construction. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
Figueroa–García, J. C., Hernandez, G., & Franco, C. (2022). A review on history, trends and perspectives of fuzzy linear programming. Operations Research Perspectives, 9, 100247.
Heriyanti, K. (2019). Pura Sebagai Bentuk Penerapan Konsep Ketuhanan Saguna Brahma. Jurnal Prodi Teologi Hindu STAHN Mpu Kuturan Singaraja, 7.
I Ketut Donder. (2021). Aspects of Bali Culture And Religion: The Implementation Of Vedic Teaching As The Basis of Balinese Hindu Religious Life. Journal of Positive Psychology & Wellbeing, 5(3), 1124–1138.
Kumar, P. S. (2020). Algorithms for solving the optimization problems using fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy set. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 11(1), 189–222.
Kundu, P., Majumder, S., Kar, S., & Maiti, M. (2019). A method to solve linear programming problem with interval type-2 fuzzy parameters. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 18, 103–130.
Lubis, A. I., Sihombing, P., & Nababan, E. B. (2020). Comparison SAW and MOORA Methods with Attribute Weighting Using Rank Order Centroid in Decision Making. 2020 3rd International Conference on Mechanical, Electronics, Computer, and Industrial Technology (MECnIT), 127–131.
Manogaran, G., Shakeel, P. M., Baskar, S., Hsu, C.-H., Kadry, S. N., Sundarasekar, R., Kumar, P. M., & Muthu, B. A. (2020). FDM: Fuzzy-optimized data management technique for improving big data analytics. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 29(1), 177–185.
Muka, I. W. (2020). Toleransi Dalam Keberagaman Umat Beragama Di Bali Studi: Tempat Ibadah Terpadu Puja Mandala Nusa Dua. Prosiding STHD Klaten Jawa Tengah, 1(1), 110–118. https://prosiding.sthd-jateng.ac.id/index.php/psthd/article/view/35
Odu, G. O. (2019). Weighting methods for multi-criteria decision making technique. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 23(8), 1449–1457.
Phillips-Wren, G., Power, D. J., & Mora, M. (2019). Cognitive bias, decision styles, and risk attitudes in decision making and DSS. Journal of Decision Systems, 28(2), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2019.1646509
Prieto, A. J., Macías-Bernal, J. M., Silva, A., & Ortiz, P. (2019). Fuzzy Decision-Support System for Safeguarding Tangible and Intangible Cultural Heritage. Sustainability, 11(14), 3953. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143953
Prieto, A. J., Turbay, I., Ortiz, R., Chávez, M. J., Macías-Bernal, J. M., & Ortiz, P. (2021). A Fuzzy Logic Approach to Preventive Conservation of Cultural Heritage Churches in Popayán, Colombia. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 15(12), 1910–1929. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2020.1737892
Prieto, A. J., Verichev, K., & Carpio, M. (2020). Heritage, resilience and climate change: A fuzzy logic application in timber-framed masonry buildings in Valparaíso, Chile. Building and Environment, 174(September 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106657
Sahoo, S. K., & Goswami, S. S. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods: Advancements, Applications, and Future Directions. Decision Making Advances, 1(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.31181/dma1120237
Segara, I. N. Y. (2012). Hindu dan Multikulturalisme: Sejarah, Warisan Budaya, Teks Suci, dan Refleksi Kritis. 1993, 1–14.
Sudipa, I. G. I., Asana, I. M. D. P., Wiguna, I. K. A. G., & Putra, I. N. T. A. (2021). Implementation of ELECTRE II Algorithm to Analyze Student Constraint Factors in Completing Thesis. 2021 6th International Conference on New Media Studies (CONMEDIA), 22–27.
Sudipa, I. G. I., Astria, C., Irnanda, K. F., Windarto, A. P., Daulay, N. K., Suharso, W., & Wijaya, H. O. L. (2020). Application of MCDM using PROMETHEE II Technique in the Case of Social Media Selection for Online Businesses. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 835(1), 12059.
Zhan, J., Jiang, H., & Yao, Y. (2020). Three-way multiattribute decision-making based on outranking relations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 29(10), 2844–2858.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ni Putu Mita Erlina Putri, I Gede Iwan Sudipa, I Komang Arya Ganda Wiguna, Ida Bagus Gede Sarasvananda, I Wayan Sunarya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.