Forecasting Airline Passenger Growth: Comparative Study LSTM VS Prophet VS Neural Prophet

Authors

  • Nihayah Afarini Information Systems Study Program, Universitas Budi Luhur, South Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Djarot Hindarto Prodi Informatika, Fakultas Teknologi Komunikasi dan Informatika, Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7501-2610

DOI:

10.33395/sinkron.v9i1.13237

Keywords:

Airline Passenger, LSTM, Neural Prophet, Prophet, Prediction Accuracy

Abstract

To conduct an exhaustive examination of airline passenger growth prediction methods, this study compares the performance of three distinct strategies: LSTM, Prophet, and Neural Prophet. To forecast passenger volumes accurately, the aviation industry needs robust prediction models due to rising demand. This research evaluates the performance of LSTM, Prophet, and Neural Prophet models in passenger growth forecasting by utilizing historical airline passenger data. A comprehensive examination of these methodologies is conducted via a rigorous comparative analysis, encompassing prediction accuracy, computational efficiency, and adaptability to ever-changing passenger traffic trends. The research methodology consists of various approaches for preprocessing time series data, engineering features, and training models. The findings elucidate the merits and drawbacks of each method, furnishing knowledge regarding their capacity to capture intricate patterns, fluctuations in passenger behavior across seasons, and abrupt shifts. The results of this study enhance comprehension regarding the relative efficacy of LSTM, Prophet, and Neural Prophet in prognosticating the expansion of airline passenger numbers. As a result, professionals and scholars can gain valuable guidance in determining which methodologies are most suitable for precise predictions of forthcoming passenger demand. This comparative study serves as a significant point of reference for enhancing aviation prediction models to optimize the industry's resource allocation, operational planning, and strategic decision-making.

GS Cited Analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Armagan, I. U. (2023). Price prediction of the Borsa Istanbul banks index with traditional methods and arti fi cial neural networks.

Bashir, T., Haoyong, C., Tahir, M. F., & Liqiang, Z. (2022). Short term electricity load forecasting using hybrid prophet-LSTM model optimized by BPNN. Energy Reports, 8, 1678–1686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.12.067

Chaturvedi, S., Rajasekar, E., Natarajan, S., & Mccullen, N. (2022). A comparative assessment of SARIMA , LSTM RNN and Fb Prophet models to forecast total and peak monthly energy demand for India. 168(April).

David, M. (2023). Comparative Analysis of ARIMA and Prophet Algorithms in Bitcoin Price Forecasting.

Gunerhan, A., Altuntas, O., & Caliskan, H. (2023). Utilization of renewable and sustainable aviation biofuels from waste tyres for sustainable aviation transport sector. 276(February).

Gupta, R., Kumar, A., Jha, S. K., & Kumar, P. (2023). Long term estimation of global horizontal irradiance using machine learning algorithms. 283(July 2022).

Hasan, M. W. (2023). Building an IoT temperature and humidity forecasting model based on long short-term memory ( LSTM ) with improved whale optimization algorithm. 6(October).

Hindarto, D., Hendrata, F., & Hariadi, M. (2023). The application of Neural Prophet Time Series in predicting rice stock at Rice Stores. 5(2), 668–681.

Huang, Y., Bai, Y., Yu, Q., Ding, L., & Ma, Y. (2022). Application of a hybrid model based on the Prophet model , ICEEMDAN and multi-model optimization error correction in metal price prediction. 79(June).

Jana, R. K., Ghosh, I., & Wallin, M. W. (2022). Taming energy and electronic waste generation in bitcoin mining : Insights from Facebook prophet and deep neural network. 178(October 2021).

Lu, Y., Sheng, B., Fu, G., Luo, R., Chen, G., & Huang, Y. (2023). Prophet-EEMD-LSTM based method for predicting energy consumption in the paint workshop. 143.

Ning, Y., Kazemi, H., & Tahmasebi, P. (2022). A comparative machine learning study for time series oil production forecasting: ARIMA, LSTM, and Prophet. Computers & Geosciences, 164, 105126. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAGEO.2022.105126

Redpath, N., Connell, J. F. O., & Warnock-smith, D. (2017). The strategic impact of airline group diversi fi cation : The cases of Emirates and Lufthansa. 64.

Sabzipour, B., Arsenault, R., Troin, M., Martel, J., & Mai, J. (2023). Comparing a long short-term memory ( LSTM ) neural network with a physically-based hydrological model for streamflow forecasting over a Canadian catchment. 627(February).

Saeed, N., Nguyen, S., Cullinane, K., Gekara, V., & Chhetri, P. (2023). Forecasting container freight rates using the Prophet forecasting method. Transport Policy, 133(January), 86–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.01.012

Zhang, B., Song, C., Li, Y., & Jiang, X. (2022). Spatiotemporal prediction of O 3 concentration based on the KNN-Prophet-LSTM model. 8(November), 0–6.

Downloads


Crossmark Updates

How to Cite

Afarini, N. ., & Hindarto, D. (2024). Forecasting Airline Passenger Growth: Comparative Study LSTM VS Prophet VS Neural Prophet. Sinkron : Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 8(1), 505-513. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v9i1.13237

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Articles Research Volume 8 Issue 1, January 2024

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Nihayah Afarini, Djarot Hindarto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>