Comparison of MAGIQ, MABAC, MARCOS, and MOORA Methods in Multi-Criteria Problems

Authors

  • Gede Dharma Sahasra Muni Fakultas Teknologi dan Informatika, Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Institut Bisnis dan Teknologi Indonesia
  • I Gede Iwan Sudipa Fakultas Teknologi dan Informatika, Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Institut Bisnis dan Teknologi Indonesia
  • Ni Putu Suci Meinarni Fakultas Teknologi dan Informatika, Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Institut Bisnis dan Teknologi Indonesia
  • I Komang Arya Ganda Wiguna Fakultas Teknologi dan Informatika, Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Institut Bisnis dan Teknologi Indonesia
  • I Made Subrata Sandhiyasa Fakultas Teknologi dan Informatika, Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Institut Bisnis dan Teknologi Indonesia

DOI:

10.33395/sinkron.v8i3.13639

Keywords:

Method Comparison, Sensitivity Analysis, MADM Method, Multi-Criteria Problems

Abstract

Determining the best alternative from many criteria is one of the core problems in decision making, both routine and non-routine problems. One of them is in the problem of determining egg suppliers. Eggs are one of the basic needs of the community so that the demand for eggs is always increasing, this makes the emergence of many egg agents in distributing and fulfilling needs. Selective and careful selection is needed in order to get a supplier that meets the desired expectations. Problems then arise in the selection of egg suppliers that are not in accordance with the expectations of the manager. In determining egg suppliers that have been carried out by UD Taluh Subur, only by means of a simple comparison between several factors such as price, production quantity, and quality without considering other factors. In addition to this, business managers have limited knowledge in statistical and business decision making. To optimize the supplier selection process, a Decision Support System can be used to help provide recommendations for selecting prospective suppliers of fixed eggs. Based on the situation of decision makers who have limited knowledge in statistical decision making, the MAGIQ method is suitable for weighting. To provide a more accurate ranking, additional methods such as the MABAC, MARCOS, and MOORA methods are used. The purpose of this research is to focus on which method is most recommended for the case study faced in the research based on the analysis results of the sensitivity test. The results of the sensitivity test show that the MAGIQ-MABAC method has the highest value of 4.42737%, then the MAGIQ-MOORA method with a value of 2.34415% and the MAGIQ-MARCOS method with a value of 0.45729%.

GS Cited Analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ambarsari, E. W., Sagita, M., & Parulian, D. (2023). Visualisasi Decision Making MAGIQ melalui GAIA Biplot: Kasus Permohonan Paten. Media Online, 4(3), 1390–1398. https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v4i3.1343

Arisman, A., Fricles, ), & Sianturi, A. (2021). JIKOMSI [Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Sistem Informasi] Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Siswa Baru Menggunakan Metode Moora (Multi-Objective Optimization On The Basis Of Ratio Analysis). Andi Arisman, 3(3).

Aristamy, I. G. A. A. M., Sudipa, I. G. I., Yanti, C. P., Pratistha, I., & Waas, V. D. (2021). An Application of a Decision Support System for Senior High School Scholarship with Modified MADM Method. 2021 6th International Conference on New Media Studies (CONMEDIA), 54–59.

Badi, I., & Pamucar, D. (2020). Supplier selection for steelmaking company by using combined grey-marcos methods. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(2), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003037b

Hasudungan Lubis, A., Hakim Lubis, J., & Rizky Aprillya, D. (2023). Perbandingan Metode MADM dalam Memilih Pegawai Terbaik dengan Pembobotan Objektif. 7(3), 1446–1454. https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v7i3.6232

Ismail, I. E., & Hasanah, A. D. (2022). SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMBERIAN PINJAMAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE MULTIATTRIBUTE APPROXIMATION BORDER AREA COMPARISON (MABAC). JTT (Jurnal Teknologi Terapan), 8(1).

Johana, L. (2020). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Kaca Dengan Menggunakan Metode Multi Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC) Pada UD.Delta Glass. Jurnal CyberTech, x. No.x.

Kementrian Kesehatan. (2023, July). Manfaat Telur Ayam. Https://Yankes.Kemkes.Go.Id/.

Kharisma, L. P. I. (2021). Sensitivitas Urutan Alternatif Keputusan Berdasarkan Prioritas Kriteria Pada Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process. Jurnal Krisnadana, 1(1), 13–22.

Khasanah, F. N., & Setiyadi, D. (2019). Uji Sensitivitas Metode Simple Additive Weighting Dan Weighted Product Dalam Menentukan Laptop. Bina Insani ICT Journal, 6(2), 165–174.

Mahendra, G. S. (2022). DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM USING FUCOM-MARCOS FOR AIRLINE SELECTION IN INDONESIA. JITK (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Teknologi Komputer), 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.33480/jitk.v8i1.2219

Mahendra, G. S., Lee, A., & Muni, G. D. S. (2021). SISTEMASI: Jurnal Sistem Informasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode FUCOM-MOORA untuk Penentuan Maskapai Favorit.

Mahendra, G. S., & Nugraha, P. G. S. C. (2020). Komparasi Metode AHP-SAW dan AHP-WP Pada SPK Penentuan E-Commerce Terbaik di Indonesia. JUSTIN (Jurnal Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 8(4), 346–356.

Mahendra, G. S., Nugraha, P. G. S. C., Indrawan, I. P. Y., & Ramayu, I. M. S. (2022). Implementasi Pemilihan Maskapai Penerbangan Menggunakan FUCOM-MABAC Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan.

Ndruru, N., Tinus Waruwu, F., & Putro Utomo, D. (2020). Penerapan Metode MABAC Untuk Mendukung Pengambilan Keputusan Pemilihan Kepala Cabang Pada PT. Cefa Indonesia Sejahtera Lestari. Media Online), 1(1), 36–49.

Nur Ihwa, B., Silalahi, N., & Kristianto Hondro, R. (2020). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Jaksa Terbaik dengan Menerapkan Metode MABAC (Studi Kasus: Kejaksaan Negeri Medan). Journal of Computer System and Informatics (JoSYC), 1(4), 225–230.

Proboningrum, S., & Sidauruk, A. (2021). SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN SUPPLIER KAIN DENGAN METODE MOORA. Sistem Informasi |, 8(1), 43–48.

Puška, A., Stojanović, I., Maksimović, A., & Osmanović, N. (2020). Project management software evaluation by using the measurement of alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution (MARCOS) method. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 3(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta2001089p

Putri, N. P. M. E., Sudipa, I. G. I., Wiguna, I. K. A. G., Sarasvananda, I. B. G., & Sunarya, I. W. (2024). Decision Making Model for Temple Revitalization in Bali Using Fuzzy-SMARTER Combination Method. Sinkron: Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 9(1), 61–74.

Rahman, V., Windia Ambarsari, E., & Rastic Andrari, F. (2023). Pemenuhan Persyaratan Permohonan Paten dengan Metode Multi-Attribute Global Inference of Quality (MAGIQ). 4(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.47065/tin.v4i1.4207

Rony, Z. T., Sofyanty, D., Sarie, F., Sudipa, I. G. I., Albani, A., & Rahim, R. (2023). Evaluating Manufacturing Machines Using ELECTRE Method: A Decision Support Approach. International Conference on Mechatronics and Intelligent Robotics, 567–578.

Sari, A. P., & Oktavia, T. (2023). DSS Using MABAC,MOORA For Selection of Majors According to Students’ Interests. SinkrOn, 8(2), 1040–1050. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i2.12335

Sarja, N. K. P. G., Candiasa, I. M., & Aryanto, K. Y. E. (2021). Decision Support System for Tour Package Recommendation in Bali Using BWM-MARCOS Method. 9(2).

Sry Yunarti, & Moeis, D. (2022). Analisis Metode WP dan SAW melalui Uji Sensitivitas untuk Penentuan Penerima Diakonia. Insect (Informatics and Security): Jurnal Teknik Informatika, 8(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.33506/insect.v8i1.1907

Stanković, M., Stević, Ž., Das, D. K., Subotić, M., & Pamučar, D. (2020). A new fuzzy marcos method for road traffic risk analysis. Mathematics, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/MATH8030457

Sudipa, I. G. I., Astria, C., Irnanda, K. F., Windarto, A. P., Daulay, N. K., Suharso, W., & Wijaya, H. O. L. (2020). Application of MCDM using PROMETHEE II Technique in the Case of Social Media Selection for Online Businesses. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 835(1), 12059.

Sudipa, I. G. I., Prananda, I. K. H., Sandhiyasa, I. M. S., Atmaja, K. J., & Radhitya, M. L. (2024). Application of The TOPSIS Approach in A Company’s Stock Investment Ranking Decision Support System Based On Value Investing. ISAR Journal of Science and Technology, 2(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10885951

Sudipa, I. G. I., & Puspitayani, I. A. D. (2019). Analisis Sensitivitas AHP-SAW dan ROC-SAW dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Multikriteria. International Journal of Natural Science and Engineering, 3(2), 85–95.

Sudipa, I. G. I., Wardoyo, R., Hatta, H. R., Sagena, U., Gunawan, I. M. A. O., Zahro, H. Z., & Adhicandra, I. (2023). MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING: Teori & Penerapan Metode Pengambilan Keputusan dengan MCDM. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Sukma, F. A., & Utami, A. W. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Menggunakan Metode VIKOR Berbasis Website. JEISBI, 03, 2022.

Susanto Putro, S., Rahmanita, E., Hasan, T., & Dwitya Pramudita, Y. (2019). The Determination of The Defender Position in Football Uses The Magiq (Multi-Attribute Global Inference Quality) Method.

Downloads


Crossmark Updates

How to Cite

Muni, G. D. S., Sudipa, I. G. I., Meinarni, N. P. S., Wiguna, I. K. A. G., & Sandhiyasa, I. M. S. (2024). Comparison of MAGIQ, MABAC, MARCOS, and MOORA Methods in Multi-Criteria Problems. Sinkron : Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 8(3), 1286-1301. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i3.13639

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 3 (2024): Research Artikel Volume 8 Issue 3, July 2024

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Gede Dharma Sahasra Muni, I Gede Iwan Sudipa, Ni Putu Suci Meinarni, I Komang Arya Ganda Wiguna, I Made Subrata Sandhiyasa

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Most read articles by the same author(s)