Fuzzy C-Means Algorithm for Grouping Students Based on Preferences and Academic Potential

Authors

  • Gellysa Urva Ms
  • Welly Desriyati Sekolah Tinggi teknologi Dumai

DOI:

10.33395/sinkron.v9i1.14369

Keywords:

Fuzzy C-Means, Student Interest, Academic Potential, Student Grouping

Abstract

Personalized education is increasingly becoming a necessity in the modern era to ensure that students get a learning experience that is relevant to their interests and academic potential. This study aims to group students into three main clusters, namely Science, Arts, and Business, using the Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) algorithm. The FCM algorithm was chosen because of its flexibility in handling multidimensional data and allows students to have degrees of membership in more than one cluster, reflecting the multidisciplinary nature of their preferences. The research dataset consists of data on students' interests in fields of study (Science, Arts, Business) and academic grades in related subjects. The clustering results show that: The Business cluster includes 59 students (46.9%), reflecting the dominance of interests in economics, global trend analysis, and business organization activities.  Artcluster consists of 39 students (30.0%), who show a preference for visual arts, art portfolio development, and involvement in community design. Science cluster has 30 students (23.1%) with interests in biology, science experiments, and biotechnology. Evaluation using Davies Bouldin Index (DBI) yields a value of 0.78, indicating good cluster quality. In addition, manual validation from teachers shows that more than 85% of students in each cluster fit the grouping based on direct observation. This study makes a significant contribution to the development of data-driven academic recommendation systems, enabling educational institutions to design learning programs that are more adaptive, relevant, and in accordance with student needs.

GS Cited Analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anter, A. M., Oliva, D., Thakare, A., & Zhang, Z. (2021). Advanced Engineering Informatics AFCM-LSMA : New intelligent model based on L ´ evy slime mould algorithm and adaptive fuzzy C-means for identification of COVID-19 infection from chest X-ray images. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 49(January), 101317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101317

Askari, S. (2020). Fuzzy C-Means clustering algorithm for data with unequal cluster sizes and contaminated with noise and outliers : review and development. Expert Systems With Applications, 113856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113856

Baig, M. A., Shaikh, S. A., & Khatri, K. K. (n.d.). Prediction of Students Performance Level Using Integrated Approach of ML Algorithms. 216–234.

Bulut, H. (2020). An improved ant-based algorithm based on heaps merging and fuzzy c-means for clustering cancer gene expression data. 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-01399-x

Cao, S., Ding, J., & Ren, C. (2020). Sensor deployment strategy using cluster analysis of Fuzzy C-Means Algorithm : Towards online control of indoor environment ’ s safety and health. Sustainable Cities and Society, 59(February), 102190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102190

Chang, S., Chuang, W., & Jeng, J. (2023). applied sciences New Interval Improved Fuzzy Partitions Fuzzy C-Means Clustering Algorithms under Different Distance Measures for Symbolic Interval Data Analysis.

Eka, S., Buananta, A., & Ahmad, M. A. (2024). Identification of Evaluation Results in E-Banking Services Transaction for Product Recommendation using the BIRCH and Davies Bouldin Index Method. 427–440.

Godi, R. K., Basvant, M. S., Pittala, R. B., Deepak, A., Pratap, A., Sankhyan, A., & Shrivastava, A. (2024). INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING A New Gaussian Kernel FCM Technique for High-Dimensional Information in Real Datasets. 12, 65–75.

Heung, I., Yim, Y., & Su, J. (2023). Artificial intelligence ( AI ) learning tools in K ‑ 12 education : A scoping review. In Journal of Computers in Education (Issue 0123456789). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00304-9

Kavitha, S. S., & Kaulgud, N. (2023). Quantum K-means clustering method for detecting heart disease. Soft Computing, 27(18), 13255–13268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07200-x

Ke, B., Nguyen, H., Bui, X., Bui, H., & Nguyen-thoi, T. (2021). Prediction of the sorption efficiency of heavy metal onto biochar using a robust combination of fuzzy C-means clustering and back-propagation neural network. 293(May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112808

Khang, T. D., Vuong, N. D., Tran, M., & Fowler, M. (2020). Fuzzy C-Means Clustering Algorithm with Multiple Fuzzification Coe ffi cients. 1–11.

Kumar, E. T. S. N. (2024). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Fuzzy C Means Clustering Coupled with Firefly Optimization Algorithm for the Segmentation of Neurodisorder Magnetic Resonance Images Fuzzy C Means Clustering Coupled with Firefly Optimization Algorithm for the Elisabeth Segmentation of Neurodisorder Magnetic. Procedia Computer Science, 235, 1577–1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.04.149

Ménard, M. A., Morin, M., Khachan, M., Gaudreault, J., & Quimper, C. G. (2023). Learn, Compare, Search: One Sawmill’s Search for the Best Cutting Patterns Across and/or Trees. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 14286 LNCS, 552–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44505-7_37

Nooraeni, R., Iqbal, M., Widowati, N., & Projo, K. (2021). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Fuzzy Centroid and Genetic Algorithms : Solutions for Numeric and Fuzzy Centroid and Genetic Mixed Algorithms : Solutions for Numeric and Categorical Data Clustering Categorical Mixed Data Clustering. Procedia Computer Science, 179(2020), 677–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.055

Pedroso, J. E., RV S. SULLEZA, Keith Hae Moon C. FRANCISCO, Ayya Jade O. NOMAN, & Chynna Althea V. MARTINEZ. (2023). Unlocking the Power of Canva: Students’ Views on Using the All-In-One Tool for Creativity and Collaboration. Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education, 2(2), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v2i2.117

Rahmatullah, I., Nugraha, G. S., & Aranta, A. (2023). Feature Selection on Grouping Students Into Lab Specializations for the Final Project Using Fuzzy C-Means. 23(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.30812/matrik.v23i1.3341

Seido, M., Almeida, A., Antonio, L., & Lorena, N. (n.d.). Author ’ s personal copy An evolutionary clustering search for the no-wait flow shop problem with sequence dependent setup times.

Subramaniam, M., Kathirvel, A., Sabitha, E., & Basha, H. A. (2021). Modified Firefly Algorithm and Fuzzy C-Mean Clustering Based Semantic Information Retrieval. 20, 33–52. https://doi.org/10.13052/jwe1540-9589.2012

Thakur, P. S., Verma, R. K., & Tiwari, R. (2024). A comparison between the fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm and the k-mean clustering algorithm. 1–11.

Uyun, S., Sulistiyowati, E., & Jati, T. A. (2024). Fuzzy C-Means algorithm modification based on distance measurement for river water quality. 4(3).

Yeh, W. C., Yang, G., & Huang, C. L. (2024). A New Node-Based Algorithm for Identifying the Complete Minimal Cut Set. Electronics (Switzerland), 13(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13030603

Downloads


Crossmark Updates

How to Cite

Urva, G., & Desriyati, W. . (2025). Fuzzy C-Means Algorithm for Grouping Students Based on Preferences and Academic Potential. Sinkron : Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 9(1), 366-373. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v9i1.14369