Optimizing Supplier Selection Through Hybrid BWM and AHP Integration

Authors

  • Afrizal Rhamadan Siregar Institut Modern Arsitektur dan Teknologi
  • Hendry Hendry Institut Modern Arsitektur dan Teknologi

DOI:

10.33395/sinkron.v9i4.15261

Keywords:

BWM, AHP, MCDM, Hybrid Model, Decision Making

Abstract

This study proposes a hybrid decision-making model that integrates the Best-Worst Method (BWM) with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to optimize supplier selection. The primary objective is to address limitations in traditional Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods, such as inconsistency, subjectivity, and cognitive overload when handling complex criteria. The proposed model leverages AHP's hierarchical structuring and BWM’s efficiency in reducing comparison load, aiming for a more accurate and consistent evaluation framework. The research design involves developing a hybrid AHP-BWM model and applying it to a dataset from the Vietnamese Textile and Apparel (T&A) sector. The methodology includes two stages: determining the weight of each criterion using a Hesitant-AHP approach, followed by evaluating supplier alternatives with BWM. The performance of the model is assessed using classification metrics, namely accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The results show that the proposed model outperforms conventional methods such as TOPSIS, ELECTRE, VIKOR, and SWARA. It achieves an accuracy of 92%, precision of 87%, recall of 86%, and an F1-score of 86%. These outcomes confirm the model’s superior ability to consistently classify supplier suitability. Furthermore, the model identifies Quality Assurance as the most critical criterion, followed by Assistance, Capacity, Charge, and Shipment. In conclusion, the hybrid AHP-BWM model offers a robust, scalable, and data-driven approach for supplier selection. Its strength lies in balancing systematic evaluation with reduced cognitive effort, making it suitable for complex real-world decision-making environments. Future research may explore its application in other domains and enhance its scalability for larger datasets.

GS Cited Analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aboutorab, H., Saberi, M., Asadabadi, M. R., Hussain, O., & Chang, E. (2018). ZBWM: The Z-number extension of Best Worst Method and its application for supplier development. Expert Systems with Applications, 107, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.04.015

Carpitella, S., Kratochvíl, V., & Pištěk, M. (2024). Multi-criteria decision making beyond consistency: An alternative to AHP for real-world industrial problems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 198, 110661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2024.110661

Debnath, B., Bari, A. B. M. M., Haq, Md. M., de Jesus Pacheco, D. A., & Khan, M. A. (2023). An integrated stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis and weighted aggregated sum product assessment framework for sustainable supplier selection in the healthcare supply chains. Supply Chain Analytics, 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2022.100001

Deretarla, Ö., Erdebilli, B., & Gündoğan, M. (2023). An integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Complex Proportional Assessment for vendor selection in supply chain management. Decision Analytics Journal, 6, 100155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100155

Dodevska, Z., Radovanović, S., Petrović, A., & Delibašić, B. (2023). When Fairness Meets Consistency in AHP Pairwise Comparisons. Mathematics, 11(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11030604

Ezzat, A. E. M., & Hamoud, H. S. (2016). Analytic hierarchy process as module for productivity evaluation and decision-making of the operation theater. Avicenna Journal of Medicine, 6(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0770.173579

Haryono, Masudin, I., Suhandini, Y., & Kannan, D. (2024). Exploring scientific publications for the development of relevant and effective supplier selection methods and criteria in the food Industry: A comprehensive analysis. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 12, 100161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2024.100161

Jain, N., & Singh, A. R. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection under must-be criteria through Fuzzy inference system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119275

Jefroudi, M. T., & Darestani, S. A. (2024). A decision support system for sustainable supplier selection problem: Evidence from a radiator manufacturing industry. Journal of Engineering Research, 12(4), 867–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2024.03.014

Kamalakannan, R., Ramesh, C., Shunmugasundaram, M., Sivakumar, P., & Mohamed, A. (2020). Evaluvation and selection of suppliers using TOPSIS. Materials Today: Proceedings, 33, 2771–2773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.105

Kriswardhana, W., Toaza, B., Esztergár-Kiss, D., & Duleba, S. (2025). Analytic hierarchy process in transportation decision-making: A two-staged review on the themes and trends of two decades. Expert Systems with Applications, 261, 125491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125491

Lin, G., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y., Shen, C., Xu, H., & Wang, S. (2024). Performance assessment of public transport networks: An AHP-ANP approach. Heliyon, 10(22), e40309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40309

Manik, M. H. (2023). Addressing the supplier selection problem by using the analytical hierarchy process. Heliyon, 9(7), e17997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17997

Moslem, S. (2024). A novel parsimonious spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for sustainable urban transport solutions. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 128, 107447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107447

Mufazzal, S., Masood, S., Khan, N. Z., Muzakkir, S. M., & Khan, Z. A. (2021). Towards minimization of overall inconsistency involved in criteria weights for improved decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 100, 106936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106936

Nong, N. M. (2021). Supplier selection criteria dataset [Dataset]. Mendeley Data.

Oliveira, M. E. B. de, Lima-Junior, F. R., & Galo, N. R. (2023a). A comparison of hesitant fuzzy VIKOR methods for supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing, 149, 110920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110920

Oliveira, M. E. B. de, Lima-Junior, F. R., & Galo, N. R. (2023b). A comparison of hesitant fuzzy VIKOR methods for supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing, 149, 110920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110920

Pamučar, D., Ecer, F., Cirovic, G., & Arlasheedi, M. A. (2020). Application of Improved Best Worst Method (BWM) in Real-World Problems. Mathematics, 8(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8081342

Pascoe, S. (2022). A Simplified Algorithm for Dealing with Inconsistencies Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Algorithms, 15(12), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/a15120442

Rahman, S., Alali, A. S., Baro, N., Ali, S., & Kakati, P. (2024). A Novel TOPSIS Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Making with Random Hypergraphs: Enhancing Decision Processes. Symmetry, 16(12), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16121602

Salvador, G., Moura, M., Campos, P., Cardoso, P., Espadinha-Cruz, P., & Godina, R. (2024). ELECTRE applied in supplier selection – a literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 232, 1759–1768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.01.174

Sitorus, F., Cilliers, J. J., & Brito-Parada, P. R. (2019). Multi-criteria decision making for the choice problem in mining and mineral processing: Applications and trends. Expert Systems with Applications, 121, 393–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.001

Tafazzoli, M., Hazrati, A., Shrestha, K., & Kisi, K. (2024). Enhancing Contractor Selection through Fuzzy TOPSIS and Fuzzy SAW Techniques. Buildings, 14(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061861

Tavana, M., Mina, H., & Santos-Arteaga, F. J. (2023). A general Best-Worst method considering interdependency with application to innovation and technology assessment at NASA. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.036

Tong, L. Z., Wang, J., & Pu, Z. (2022). Sustainable supplier selection for SMEs based on an extended PROMETHEE Ⅱ approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, 129830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129830

Wang, C.-N., Tsai, H.-T., Ho, T.-P., Nguyen, V.-T., & Huang, Y.-F. (2020). Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Model for Supplier Evaluation and Selection for Oil Production Projects in Vietnam. Processes, 8(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8020134

Wątróbski, J. (2023). Temporal PROMETHEE II — New multi-criteria approach to sustainable management of alternative fuels consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 413, 137445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137445

Xiang, Z., & Zhang, X. (2025). An integrated decision support system for supplier selection and performance evaluation in global supply chains. Applied Soft Computing, 180, 113325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113325

Zheng, M., Wang, L., & Tian, Y. (2025). Does Cognitive Load Influence Moral Judgments? The Role of Action–Omission and Collective Interests. Behavioral Sciences, 15(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030361

Downloads


Crossmark Updates

How to Cite

Siregar, A. R., & Hendry, H. (2025). Optimizing Supplier Selection Through Hybrid BWM and AHP Integration. Sinkron : Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 9(4), 1978-1987. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v9i4.15261

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025): Articles Research October 2025

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Afrizal Rhamadan Siregar, Hendry Hendry

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC