Line-of-Sight Dominance Over Vegetation: Simulation-Based LoRa Performance in Tropical Forest Terrain
DOI:
10.33395/sinkron.v10i1.15627Keywords:
elevation effects, environmental monitoring, line-of-sight, LoRa, LPWAN, propagation models, tropical forest, vegetation attenuationAbstract
Low-Power Wide-Area Network (LPWAN) technologies, especially LoRa, are receiving considerable interest for applications involving environmental monitoring in difficult terrain conditions. However, existing research predominantly examines vegetation attenuation or terrain elevation effects separately, leaving a critical research gap in understanding their combined and interactive impacts on LoRa connectivity in tropical forest environments. Furthermore, most studies rely on simplified propagation models that inadequately represent the complex radio environment of tropical forests, and few investigations systematically compare the relative importance of vegetation density, elevation, and line-of-sight conditions. This work addresses these gaps through an in-depth simulation-based investigation of LoRa network behavior in the University of Brawijaya (UB) Forest, which serves as a typical tropical forest setting in Indonesia. We performed detailed simulations using Python and LoRaSim, employing fine-resolution elevation datasets and precise vegetation classification to examine how dense vegetation, medium vegetation, and elevation parameters influence LoRa communication performance. Our findings indicate that, in contrast to traditional propagation models, nodes located in dense vegetation zones reached a 90.0% success rate, as opposed to 65.0% in zones without vegetation. Additional investigation shows that line-of-sight presence (28.6% versus 0.0% success rate) and relative elevation relative to the gateway (11.1% versus 27.3% success rate for nodes positioned above and below the gateway, respectively) represent more crucial factors for connectivity compared to vegetation attenuation by itself. These outcomes offer important guidance for enhancing LoRa-based environmental monitoring systems in tropical forest settings through strategic node positioning that considers elevation characteristics and line-of-sight availability.
Downloads
References
Abbasi, M., Yazdanian, H., & Afshari, F. (2019). Internet of Things–based water quality monitoring and smart irrigation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet of Things (IoT), 105–110. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IoT.2019.00025
Adelantado, F., Vilajosana, X., Tuset-Peiró, P., Martinez, B., Melia-Segui, J., & Watteyne, T. (2017). Understanding the limits of LoRaWAN. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(9), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600613
Augustin, A., Yi, J., Clausen, T., & Townsley, W. M. (2016). A study of LoRa: Long range and low power networks for the Internet of Things. Sensors, 16(9), Article 1466. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16091466
Bor, M. C., Roedig, U., Voigt, T., & Alonso, J. M. (2016). Do LoRa low-power wide-area networks scale? Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, 59–67. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2988287.2989163
Cattani, M., Boano, C. A., & Römer, K. (2019). An experimental evaluation of the reliability of LoRa long-range low-power wireless communication. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 8(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan8010007
Ferrer-Cid, P., Barceló-Ordinas, J. M., Garcia-Vidal, J., Ripoll, A., & Viana, M. (2021). A comparative study of LoRaWAN, Sigfox, and NB-IoT for smart water grid monitoring. In ICT systems security and privacy protection (pp. 353–369). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78086-0_27
Goldsmith, A. (2005). Wireless communications. Cambridge University Press.
Haxhibeqiri, J., De Poorter, E., Moerman, I., & Hoebeke, J. (2018). A survey of LoRaWAN for IoT: From technology to application. Sensors, 18(11), Article 3995. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113995
International Telecommunication Union. (2016). Attenuation in vegetation (Recommendation ITU-R P.833-9). https://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-P.833-9-201607-I/en
International Telecommunication Union. (2019). Calculation of free-space attenuation (Recommendation ITU-R P.525-4). https://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-P.525-4-201908-I/en
Iova, O., Murphy, A., Picco, G. P., Ghiro, L., Molteni, D., Ossi, F., & Cagnacci, F. (2017). LoRa from the city to the mountains: Exploration of hardware and environmental factors. Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks, 317–322. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3108009.3108029
Liando, J. C., Gamage, A., Tengourtius, A. W., & Li, M. (2019). Known and unknown facts of LoRa: Experiences from a large-scale measurement study. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 15(2), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500
Meng, Y. S., Lee, Y. H., & Ng, B. C. (2009). Study of propagation loss prediction in forest environment. Progress in Electromagnetics Research B, 17, 117–133. https://doi.org/10.2528/PIERB09071804
Mikhaylov, K., Petäjäjärvi, J., & Hänninen, T. (2016). Analysis of capacity and scalability of the LoRa low power wide area network technology. Proceedings of the European Wireless Conference, 1–6. VDE.
Oliveira, R., Guardalben, L., & Sargento, S. (2020). Long range communications in urban and rural environments. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), 1–6. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCC50000.2020.9219627
Petäjäjärvi, J., Mikhaylov, K., Pettissalo, M., Janhunen, J., & Iinatti, J. (2017). Performance of a low-power wide-area network based on LoRa technology: Doppler robustness, scalability, and coverage. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147717699412
Raza, U., Kulkarni, P., & Sooriyabandara, M. (2017). Low power wide area networks: An overview. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(2), 855–873. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2652320
Sanchez-Iborra, R., Sanchez-Gomez, J., Ballesta-Viñas, J., Cano, M.-D., & Skarmeta, A. F. (2020). Performance evaluation of LoRa considering scenario conditions. Sensors, 18(3), Article 772. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030772
Wixted, A. J., Kinnaird, P., Larijani, H., Tait, A., Ahmadinia, A., & Strachan, N. (2016). Evaluation of LoRa and LoRaWAN for wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Sensors Conference, 1–3. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2016.7808632
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rachmad Atmoko, Rifqi Hidayatullah, Septian Na’im, Izzun Ni`am, AB Setiawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






















Moraref
PKP Index
Indonesia OneSearch
OCLC Worldcat
Index Copernicus
Scilit
