An OWL-Based Ontology Model of Food Production and Distribution in Indonesian

Authors

  • Joko Purwanto Politeknik Negeri Cilacap
  • Muhammad Abdul Muin Politeknik Negeri Cilacap
  • Adlan Nugroho Politeknik Negeri Cilacap
  • Kukuh Muhammad Politeknik Negeri Cilacap

DOI:

10.33395/sinkron.v10i1.15664

Keywords:

Ontology;, Food production, Food distribution, Food security, Semantic Web

Abstract

Food security in Indonesia is influenced by the dynamics of production, distribution, and availability between regions. However, many existing information systems still rely on conventional data structures without semantic integration, which limits interoperability and hinders interregional analysis. To address this gap, this study developed an ontology model based on the Web Ontology Language (OWL) that formally represents the relationships between food production, commodity characteristics, distribution flows, food insecurity conditions, and geographical context. The ontology was built using Protégé through stages of literature review, official data collection from BPS, FAO, and the Ministry of Agriculture, conceptual model design, implementation, and evaluation. Conceptual validation was conducted through Focus Group Discussions (FGD) with food supply chain experts to ensure the suitability of the ontology structure and the actual conditions of the national food system. The technical evaluation involved consistency testing using the Pellet reasoner and Competency Question (CQ) testing through SPARQL queries to assess the ontology's ability to respond to essential information needs. The resulting ontology consists of five core classes (FoodProduction, FoodItem, FoodDistribution, FoodSecurityStatus, and GeographicRegion) which collectively represent the semantic structure of Indonesia's food supply chain. The evaluation results show that the ontology is structurally consistent and capable of producing outputs that are in line with CQ, including the retrieval of production-distribution information and the initial identification of commodity surpluses and deficits based on instance data. These findings indicate that the developed ontology provides a coherent semantic foundation for modeling food systems and has strong potential to support the development of knowledge-based food security management applications.

GS Cited Analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adrianus, R. (2019). Gambaran Kegiatan Pengawasan Dan Pembinaan Keamanan Pangan Segar yang Beredar Di Masyarakat tahun 2018. Universitas Andalas.

Alshammari, H. H., Altaieb, M. O., Boukrara, A., Gasmi, K., & A.elmoniem, M. (2022). Expansion of the olive crop based on modeling climatic variables using geographic information system (GIS) in Aljouf region KSA. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 202, 107280. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPAG.2022.107280

Ameri, F., Wallace, E., Yoder, R., & Riddick, F. (2023). Agri-Food Supply Chain Traceability Supported By a Formal Ontology: a Grain Elevator To Processor Use Case. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 2, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2023118860

Defiyanti, S., Ashari, A., & Lelono, D. (2022). Ontology Based Knowledge Modelling for Indonesian Rice Varieties. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 100(23), 6861–6873.

Dooley, D., Weber, M., Ibanescu, L., Lange, M., Chan, L., Soldatova, L., Yang, C., Warren, R., Shimizu, C., McGinty, H. K., & Hsiao, W. (2024). Food process ontology requirements. Semantic Web, 15(4), 1133–1164. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-223096

FAO. (2022a). Climate change and food security: risks and responses.

FAO. (2022b). Food Security and Nutrition around the world. In The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2022 (pp. 30–35).

FAO. (2023). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2023: Revealing the True Cost of Food to Transform Agrifood Systems. In The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2023.

FM, M. F. (2009). Analisis Stok dalam Sistem Distribusi Penunjang Ketahanan Pangan. Agrointek, 4(1), 39–48. https://journal.trunojoyo.ac.id/agrointek/article/download/2738/2185

Gunawan, C. I., Dyanasari, Supartini, N., Suhendrik, H., Yoga, T., Aditia, D., & Cindi, V. R. (2024). Sistem Informasi Manajemen Pangan Terintegrasi Online. International Research and Development for Human Beings (IRDH).

Indonesia, P. R. (2012). Undang-undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2012.

Kollia, I., Stevenson, J., & Kollias, S. (2021). AI-Enabled Efficient and Safe Food Supply Chain. Electronics, 10(11), 1223. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10111223

Maharani, A., & Puspasari, E. (2024). Literatur Review : Analisis Pemantauan Ketersediaan dan Distribusi Beras dalam Upaya Ketahanan Pangan. Karimah Tauhid, 3(10).

Malik, N., Hijam, D., & Sharan, A. (2021). Ontology based knowledge representation: Case study from agriculture domain. International Journal of Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Engineering Systems, 25(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.3233/KES-210055

Masliani, I. H., Mahrita, S., Sari, M., & Lestari, Y. M. (2024). Pertanian era modern: Dinamika pertanian dan solusi inovatif untuk petani. PT Media Penerbit Indonesia. http://repository.mediapenerbitindonesia.com/354/1/1. K 147 - %28FINISH LAYOUT%29 Pertanian Era Modern.pdf

Muliani, R., Ujianti, D., Novita, M., & Muflihati, I. (2022). Pemetaan Dimensi Ketahanan Pangan berbasis Web GIS dan Metode TOPSIS Mapping the Dimensions of Food Security based on Web GIS and TOPSIS Methods. 21(3), 735–752. https://doi.org/10.30812/matrik.v21i3.1730

Pujilestari, S. al. (2024). Ketahanan Pangan DKI Jakarta dengan Kecerdasan Buatan (pp. 593–628). Lembaga Layanan Pendidikan Tinggi Wilayah III.

Purwanto, J., Kusrini, & Sunyoto, A. (2017). Ontology Modeling Of Digital Library Using SLIMS Database Schema. 3rd International Conference on Engineering of Tarumanagara (ICET), 59.

Putra, M. U. M., Dilham, A., Program, E. D., & Pengetahuan, S. (2016). Ontologi dalam esensi ilmu ekonomi dan sumber pengetahuan. 6(April), 13–22.

Putri Elfriede, D. (2022). Strategi Ketahanan Pangan Global di Masa Ketidakpastian. Forum Manajemen, 36(2), 25–30. https://journal.prasetiyamulya.ac.id/journal/index.php/FM/article/view/970

Ruauw, E. (2015). Kajian Distribusi Pangan Pokok Beras di Kabupaten Kepulauan Talaud. AGRI-SOSIOEKONOMI, 11(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.35791/agrsosek.11.1.2015.7342

Salasa, A. R. (2021). Paradigma dan Dimensi Strategi Ketahanan Pangan Indonesia Paradigm and Dimensions of Indonesia ’ s Food Security Strategy. 13(1), 35–48.

Sarikaya, B. (2017). Unbalanced Distribution Of Food. Society Register, 1(1), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2017.1.1.16

Shen, Z., Wang, S., Boussemart, J. P., & Hao, Y. (2022). Digital transition and green growth in Chinese agriculture. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 181, 121742. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2022.121742

Suryana, A. (2014). Menuju Ketahanan Pangan Indonesia Berkelanjutan 2025: Tantangan dan Penanganannya. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 32(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v32n2.2014.123-135

Syaifullah, Y. (2013). Ketahanan Pangan dan Pola Distribusi Beras di Propinsi Jawa Timur. JEJAK (Journal of Economics and Policy), 6(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/jejak.v7i1.3596

United Nations. (2022). World Population Prospects 2022.

Downloads


Crossmark Updates

How to Cite

Purwanto, J. ., Muin, M. A. ., Nugroho, A. ., & Muhammad, K. . (2026). An OWL-Based Ontology Model of Food Production and Distribution in Indonesian. Sinkron : Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 10(1), 294-304. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v10i1.15664