Orchestrating the Circular Smart Palm Ecosystem: A Design Science Research Using TOGAF-Based Enterprise Architecture
DOI:
10.33395/sinkron.v10i2.15828Keywords:
Enterprise Architecture, TOGAF ADM, Circular Economy, Palm Oil Traceability, Blockchain, BioenergyAbstract
The global palm oil industry is currently confronting a sustainability trilemma involving production efficiency, regulatory compliance (e.g., EUDR), and environmental circularity. Existing supply chain models are characterized by fragmented information systems, where Operational Technology (OT) remains disconnected from Enterprise IT, resulting in traceability gaps and underutilized biomass waste. This study addresses these challenges by designing a comprehensive Enterprise Architecture (EA) for a Circular Smart Palm ecosystem. Adopting a Design Science Research (DSR) methodology, the research applies the TOGAF Architecture Development Method (ADM), supported by ArchiMate 3.1 modeling, to develop an integrated architectural blueprint. The proposed architecture consolidates blockchain-enabled traceability, digital export compliance, IoT-driven bioenergy valorization, and value-added kernel processing into a unified enterprise framework. The resulting architecture is qualitatively validated through architectural consistency analysis and gap assessment between the As-Is and To-Be states. From a theoretical perspective, this study contributes to Enterprise Architecture literature by extending EA as an integrative mechanism for circular bioeconomy implementation in sustainability-driven agribusiness ecosystems. The findings demonstrate that enterprise-level architectural integration can transform sustainability compliance from an operational constraint into a strategic enabler for traceability, circular value creation, and digital governance.
Downloads
References
Wahyuni, H. C., Rosyid, M. A., Sabrina, B., Gunawan, I., & Tieman, M. (2025). Blockchain in the food supply chain: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Spektrum Industri, 23(1), 42–57.
Rajput, D. V., More, P. R., Adhikari, P. A., & Arya, S. S. (2025). Blockchain technology in the food supply chain: A pathway toward circular economy and sustainability. Sustainable Food Technology. https://doi.org/10.1039/xxxxxxx
Olech, I., & Anyebe, D. (2024). Evolution of blockchain’s impact on agri-food supply chains. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, 71(1), 45–60.
Traceability in the agri-food supply chain: A new perspective under circular economy. (2024). Production Engineering Archives, 30(2), 140–151.
A survey on evaluation of blockchain-based agricultural traceability. (2024). Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 227, 109548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.109548
Blockchain integration in agriculture for transparent farm-to-fork supply chains. (2025). SHS Web of Conferences, 216, 01073. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202521601073
Blockchain-based traceability architecture for object flows. (2023). Sensors, 23(3), 1410. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031410
Judijanto, L. (2024). A review of palm oil valorization technologies. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology, 4(1), 1–12.
Innovative circular bioeconomy and decarbonization in palm oil waste management. (2025). Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 186, 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2025.xxxxxx
Circular bioeconomy in the palm oil industry: Pathways and challenges. (2023). Environmental Technology & Innovation, 30, 103050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103050
Applying the circular economy framework to blockchain agricultural production. (2023). Sustainability, 16(18), 8004. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188004
Unlocking circular economy and green innovation pathways. (2025). Frontiers in Sustainability, 6, 1298743. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2025.1298743
Integrated circular economy and green supply chain planning model. (2025). International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 20(2), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.200214
Zaw, T. O. K., Anbananthen, K. S. M., Muthaiyah, S., et al. (2025). A systematic TOGAF-driven framework for blockchain-based food traceability with access control layers. HighTech and Innovation Journal, 6(2), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.28991/HIJ-2025-06-02-14
Wedha, B. Y., Vasandani, M. S., & Wedha, A. E. P. B. (2023). Enterprise Architecture Design for the Transformation of Online Financial Services. Sinkron, 8(4), 2670–2678.
Enterprise architecture and building blocks for digital transformation. (2024). Journal of Enterprise Information Management. Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-2024-xxxx
Vinardo, D., et al. (2023). Evaluating TOGAF ADM implementation for enterprise transformation: A case study approach. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 19(2), 55–68.
The Open Group. (2019). ArchiMate® 3.1 specification. The Open Group.
The Open Group. (2018). TOGAF® standard, version 9.2. The Open Group.
Downloads
|
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ibnu Hamdani, Richardus Eko Indrajit, Januponsa Dio Firizqi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Muhammad Khoiruddin harahap
Google Scholar 
Moraref
PKP Index
Garuda Kemdikbud
Indonesia OneSearch
OCLC Worldcat
Dimensions
Index Copernicus
Scilit
