Decision Support System (DSS) for Rodenticide Selection using the TOPSIS Method
DOI:
10.33395/sinkron.v10i2.16008Keywords:
Decision Support System, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Pest Control, Rodenticide Selection, TOPSISAbstract
Selecting an appropriate rodenticide is a critical decision in pest control operations, as each product differs in effectiveness, application cost, safety level, environmental impact, and resistance potential. In practice, rodenticide selection is often based on technician experience or habitual product use, which may result in subjective and less optimal decisions. This study aims to develop a decision support system for rodenticide selection using the TOPSIS method within a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework. The evaluation is conducted based on six criteria: effectiveness, application cost, safety derived from LD50 values, secondary poisoning risk, resistance potential, and application convenience. To improve the robustness of the decision-making model, this study incorporates an adaptive TOPSIS approach through scenario-based weighting and compares the results with the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method. The findings show that alternatives with a balanced performance in terms of safety and operational cost consistently achieve higher rankings, with Warfarin Bait and Zinc Phosphide appearing as top-performing options across different evaluation scenarios. In addition, the proposed model is implemented in a web-based system using a prototype development approach, enabling automated calculations and transparent ranking results. This study provides a structured and practical decision support model that integrates technical, economic, and environmental considerations to support more objective decision-making in pest control management.
Downloads
References
Abdolalizadeh, E., Bakhoda, H., & Almassi, M. (2025). Optimizing cultivation choices through the TOPSIS and conceptual models: Expert insights on agricultural practices. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 27, 100780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100780
Ali, R., Hussain, A., Nazir, S., Khan, S., & Khan, H. U. (2023). Intelligent Decision Support Systems—An Analysis of Machine Learning and Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods. Applied Sciences, 13(22), 12426. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132212426
Balicka, H. (2023). Digital technologies in the accounting information system supporting decision-making processes. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, 2023(169), 57–89. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2023.169.4
Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of-the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 13051–13069. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056
Chen, T.-Y. (2023). Evolved distance measures for circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their exploitation in the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutions. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(7), 7347–7401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10318-x
Chen, Z., Zhou, L., Yang, M., Luo, F., Lou, Z., Zhang, X., Sun, H., & Wang, X. (2020). Index design and safety evaluation of pesticides application based on a fuzzy AHP model for beverage crops: tea as a case study. Pest Management Science, 76(2), 520–526. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5539
Chowdhury, D., & Bharadwaj, A. (2022). Selection of Pesticides in Agriculture Using Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Technique: A Methodolgy. 75(3) 2021 227-233.
Elkady, S., Hernantes, J., & Labaka, L. (2024). Decision-making for community resilience: A review of decision support systems and their applications. In Heliyon (Vol. 10, Number 12). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33116
Gunawan, A. P., & Utama, D. N. (2024). Decision support model to assess pesticide safeness toward environment. Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology, 39(1), e2024003. https://doi.org/10.5620/eaht.2024003
Huang, X., Wang, X., Zhang, X., Zhou, C., Ma, J., & Feng, X. (2022). Ecological risk assessment and identification of risk control priority areas based on degradation of ecosystem services: A case study in the Tibetan Plateau. Ecological Indicators, 141, 109078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109078
Ili Sama, M., Kelen, Y. P. K., Gelu, L. P., & S. Manek, S. (2025). Decision support system for selecting the best pesticide to eradicate pests on bean plants applying the Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Approach. Jurnal Simantec, 14(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.21107/simantec.v14i1.29954
Jurišić, A., Ćupina, A. I., Kavran, M., Potkonjak, A., Ivanović, I., Bjelić-Čabrilo, O., Meseldžija, M., Dudić, M., Poljaković-Pajnik, L., & Vasić, V. (2022). Surveillance Strategies of Rodents in Agroecosystems, Forestry and Urban Environments. Sustainability, 14(15), 9233. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159233
Kizielewicz, B., Wątróbski, J., & Sałabun, W. (2025). Multi-criteria decision support system for the evaluation of UAV intelligent agricultural sensors. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11201-1
Lombardi, P., & Todella, E. (2023). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Evaluate Sustainability and Circularity in Agricultural Waste Management. Sustainability, 15(20), 14878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014878
Madanchian, M., & Taherdoost, H. (2023). A comprehensive guide to the TOPSIS method for multi-criteria decision making. Sustainable Social Development, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.54517/ssd.v1i1.2220
Márquez-Barja, J., Calafate, C. T., Cano, J.-C., & Manzoni, P. (2011). An overview of vertical handover techniques: Algorithms, protocols and tools. Computer Communications, 34(8), 985–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2010.11.010
Mishra, R. K., Mishra, D., & Agarwal, R. (2025). ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING. Bhumi Publishing, India.
Rana, H., Umer, M., Hassan, U., Asgher, U., Silva-Aravena, F., & Ehsan, N. (2023). Application of fuzzy TOPSIS for prioritization of patients on elective surgeries waiting list - A novel multi-criteria decision-making approach. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 6(1), 603–630. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame060127022023r
Sahoo, S. K., & Goswami, S. S. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods: Advancements, Applications, and Future Directions. Decision Making Advances, 1(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.31181/dma1120237
Sharma, T., Kumar, A., Pant, S., & Kotecha, K. (2023). Wastewater Treatment and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Review. IEEE Access, 11, 143704–143720. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3343150
Shyur, H.-J., & Shih, H.-S. (2024). Resolving Rank Reversal in TOPSIS: A Comprehensive Analysis of Distance Metrics and Normalization Methods. Informatica, 837–858. https://doi.org/10.15388/24-INFOR576
Steingrímsdóttir, M. M., Petersen, A., & Fantke, P. (2018). A screening framework for pesticide substitution in agriculture. Journal of Cleaner Production, 192, 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.266
Sukamto, S., Fitriansyah, A., & Nugrah, R. A. (2023). DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR SELECTION OF PESTICIDES FOR CHILI PLANTS USING THE MABAC METHOD. Jurnal Teknik Informatika (Jutif), 4(5), 1109–1118. https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jutif.2023.4.5.977
Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2024). A Comprehensive Survey and Literature Review on TOPSIS. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 15(1), 1–65. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSSMET.347947
Yao, T., Sun, P., & Zhao, W. (2023). Triazine Herbicides Risk Management Strategies on Environmental and Human Health Aspects Using In-Silico Methods. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(6), 5691. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065691
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ayu Tri Nur Fitasari, Erba Lutfina, Galuh Wilujeng Saraswati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






















Moraref
PKP Index
Indonesia OneSearch
OCLC Worldcat
Index Copernicus
Scilit
