Explainable AI-Based Hybrid LightGBM–LSTM for Banking Fraud Detection

Authors

  • Rafif Ramadhan Al Yarda Universitas Nasional
  • Fauziah Master of Information Technology, Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

10.33395/sinkron.v10i4.16711

Keywords:

Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Fraud Detection, Hybrid LightGBM–LSTM, Banking, SHAP

Abstract

Banking fraud detection faces changing transaction behaviors, class imbalance, and the need to interpret the outputs of complex models. This study develops a Fraud Detection and Analysis System (FDAS) as a Decision Support System in the form of a prototype that integrates tabular and temporal modeling, imbalance handling, operational validation, and post-prediction interpretation. A quantitative experimental approach was employed using a synthetic transaction dataset constructed based on the characteristics of observed fraud and normal patterns, comprising 50 accounts, consisting of 25 fraud accounts and 25 normal accounts, covering the period from January to December 2025. Account-level splitting was used to prevent historical information leakage across accounts, while TPH-SMOTE and KHOI-SMOTE were applied only to the training set. LightGBM and LSTM were trained independently to represent tabular and temporal data, respectively, and their probabilities were subsequently combined through weighted decision-level late-fusion, with SOP serving as the operational validation layer. SHAP was employed as a post-hoc explanation to support interpretability, traceability, and human oversight. Across 1,000 paired evaluation units, the final configuration achieved an Accuracy of 97.4%, Precision of 96.8%, Recall of 96.2%, F1-score of 96.5%, and ROC-AUC of 0.984. Comparison across configurations indicated that the highest performance was achieved by the integrated configuration within the experimental environment used. FDAS demonstrates end-to-end integration to support fraud investigation through recommendations and interpretive information, while the final decision remains with the analyst. The use of synthetic data, 50 accounts, and a prototype status limits direct generalization to operational banking populations and production readiness.

GS Cited Analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almusallam, N., & Qayyum, J. (2025). A Hybrid Feature Selection and Clustering-Based Ensemble Learning Approach for Real-Time Fraud Detection in Financial Transactions. Computers, Materials & Continua, 85(2), 3653–3687. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2025.067220

Alshudukhi, K. S., Ali, S., Humayun, M., & Alruwaili, O. (2025). Next-Generation Lightweight Explainable AI for Cybersecurity: A Review on Transparency and Real-Time Threat Mitigation. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 145(3), 3029–3085. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2025.073705

Bernardo, A., & Della Valle, E. (2022). An extensive study of C-SMOTE, a Continuous Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique for Evolving Data Streams. Expert Systems with Applications, 196, 116630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116630

Bhuiyan, M. S. M., Rafi, M. A., Rodrigues, G. N., Mir, M. N. H., Ishraq, A., Mridha, M. F., & Shin, J. (2025). Deep learning for algorithmic trading: A systematic review of predictive models and optimization strategies. Array, 26, 100390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2025.100390

Chen, Y., Zhao, C., Xu, Y., Nie, C., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Deep Learning in Financial Fraud Detection: Innovations, Challenges, and Applications. Data Science and Management, S2666764925000372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2025.08.002

Ding, L., Liu, L., Wang, Y., Shi, P., & Yu, J. (2024). An AutoEncoder enhanced light gradient boosting machine method for credit card fraud detection. PeerJ Computer Science, 10, e2323. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2323

Du, Z., Yan, S., Wang, J., Guo, X., & Liu, S. (2026). TPH-SMOTE: A tri-process heuristic oversampling approach integrating SMOTE and whale optimization for imbalanced binary classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 306, 130952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.130952

El Hachimi, K., Orhanou, G., & Ballihi, L. (2026). Credit card fraud detection model based on optimized long short-term memory: Imbalanced class solution and overfitting reduction. Expert Systems with Applications, 305, 130871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.130871

Esenogho, E., Mienye, I. D., Swart, T. G., Aruleba, K., & Obaido, G. (2022). A Neural Network Ensemble With Feature Engineering for Improved Credit Card Fraud Detection. IEEE Access, 10, 16400–16407. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3148298

Gong, J., Qu, Z., Zhu, Z., Xu, H., & Yang, Q. (2025). Ensemble models of TCN-LSTM-LightGBM based on ensemble learning methods for short-term electrical load forecasting. Energy, 318, 134757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.134757

Kim, S.-W., & Kim, Y. S. (2025). Two-Stage LightGBM Framework for Cost-Sensitive Prediction of Impending Failures of Component X in Scania Trucks. Computers, Materials & Continua, 0(0), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2025.073492

Liu, X., Xie, S., Yang, J., Wu, S., Du, M., Ji, Y., Zheng, H., An, H., Zhou, W., Lv, H., Ji, G., Yang, Q., Xu, L., Chen, Y., & Yang, Y. (2026). KHOI-SMOTE: An efficient oversampling technique based on k-means clustering and h-outlyingness index for imbalanced medical data. Neurocomputing, 671, 132643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2026.132643

Lukács, A., & Váradi, S. (2023). GDPR-compliant AI-based automated decision-making in the world of work. Computer Law & Security Review, 50, 105848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105848

Nimmy, S. F., Hussain, O. K., Chakrabortty, R. K., & Saha, S. (2025). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in glaucoma assessment: Advancing the frontiers of machine learning algorithms. Knowledge-Based Systems, 316, 113333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113333

Prashanth, B. S., Kumar, M., Hoque, A., Al Muraqab, N., Moonesar, I. A., Braendle, U. C., & Rao, A. (2026). Prediction of bank transaction fraud using TabNet—An adaptive deep learning architecture. International Review of Economics & Finance, 106, 104916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2026.104916

Tien, H. T., Tran-Trung, K., & Hoang, V. T. (2024). Blockchain-Data Mining Fusion for Financial Anomaly Detection: A Brief Review. Procedia Computer Science, 235, 478–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.04.047

Uddin, N. (2025). Role of AI in Preventing Financial Crime: A Comprehensive Analytical Review. Journal of Economic Criminology, 100200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100200

Vijay Anand, R., Magesh, G., Alagiri, I., Brahmam, M. G., Balusamy, B., Selvan, C. P., Alshahrani, H. M., Getahun, M., & Soufiene, B. O. (2025). Design of an improved model using federated learning and LSTM autoencoders for secure and transparent blockchain network transactions. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 1615. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83564-4

Widodo, A. O., Setiawan, B., & Indraswari, R. (2024). Machine Learning-Based Intrusion Detection on Multi-Class Imbalanced Dataset Using SMOTE. Procedia Computer Science, 234, 578–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.042

Yousefimehr, B., & Ghatee, M. (2025). A distribution-preserving method for resampling combined with LightGBM-LSTM for sequence-wise fraud detection in credit card transactions. Expert Systems with Applications, 262, 125661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125661

Zhou, Y., Li, H., Xiao, Z., & Qiu, J. (2023). A user-centered explainable artificial intelligence approach for financial fraud detection. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104309

Zhou, Y., Wang, S., Li, Z., Feng, R., & Fernandez, C. (2025). Battery pack capacity estimation based on improved cooperative co-evolutionary strategy and LightGBM hybrid models using indirect health features. Journal of Energy Storage, 131, 115914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.115914

Downloads


Crossmark Updates

How to Cite

Yarda, R. R. A., & Fauziah, F. (2026). Explainable AI-Based Hybrid LightGBM–LSTM for Banking Fraud Detection. Sinkron : Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 10(4), 2319-2335. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v10i4.16711