Collaboration of Profile Matching and MCDM-AHP Methods on Employee Selection for Promotion

Authors

  • Akmaludin Akmaludin STMIK Nusa Mandiri Jakarta
  • Erene Gernaria Sihombing Universitas Nusa Mandiri, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Linda Sari Dewi Universitas Nusa Mandiri
  • Rinawati Rinawati Universitas Nusa Mandiri, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Ester Arisawati Universitas Nusa Mandiri, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

10.33395/sinkron.v7i1.11203

Keywords:

MCDM-AHP, Profile Matching, Promotion, Objectives, Selections.

Abstract

To give appreciation to every employee who has been able to understand the journey of the system in a company, it is appropriate to be given appreciation in the process of changing leadership and as a form of motivation for all employees in the company as a form of promotion. The promotion process must be carried out objectively, so that a good leadership change system can be seen as a strength in the company's survival for each period. The process of changing leadership through promotions is at the forefront of running a sustainable company. With so many employees, the biggest obstacle that often becomes crucial is how to select the leadership relay holder through promotions in the company that can be carried out objectively, thus a method is needed. worthy to be used as a benchmark for selecting employees in terms of promotion. There is a method that can be used for employee selection as a form of promotion, namely the profile matching method through the assessment of the weight of the Aspects and the magnitude of the GAP value with the concept of determining the largest rank as the winner in the selection process for promoted employees. Of the six employees who are appointed as candidates for leadership candidates through promotions, they will be selected consistently with a number of criteria as a barometer of the selection process. The results obtained through the promotion of positions in the leadership change process were the first rank was elected KR02 (4.67), followed by the second rank KR01 (4.65) and the third rank KR05 (4.46). Thus, it can be said that the combination of profile matching and MCDM-AHP methods can be used to carry out the employee selection process as a form of promotion.

 

GS Cited Analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, Y., Arif, S., Munir, F., Azeem, M. B., & Khan, A. U. (2020). Can india-pakistan sports promote peace? A MCDM approach. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 12(1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v12i1.642

Allba, F. O., & Sasmita, N. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Asesor Ujian Kompetenesi Dengan Menerapkan Metode Profile Macthing (Studi Kasus Smks Imelda)”.

Bellahcene, M., Benamar, F. Z., & Mekidiche, M. (2020). Ahp and wafgp hybrid model for information system project selection. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 12(2), 228–253. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v12i2.761

Dixon-Ogbechi, B. N., & Adebayo, A. K. (2020). Application of the ahp model to determine prefab housing adoption factors for developers in Lagos State. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 12(2), 297–327. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v12i2.635

Herlambang, B. A., Dewanto, F. M., Harjanta, A. T., & Setyawati, V. A. V. (2018). Implementation of Profile Matching Methods In A Mobile Based Adolescent Nutritional Assesment Systems. Jurnal Transformatika, 16(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26623/transformatika.v16i1.868

Kamps, C., & Jassemi-Zargani, R. (2021). Decision Making In Dynamic Environments: An Application Of Machine Learning To The Analytical Hierarchy Process. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 13(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v13i1.766

Nisa, K., & Sutinah, E. (2018). Profile Matching Untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Vendor Maintenance Server dan Jaringan. Jurnal Informatika, 5(2), 262–269. https://doi.org/10.31311/ji.v5i2.3638

Noshad, M., & Asgharipour, S. (2019). Application of the analytic hierarchy method to optimize the choice of a gluten-free cookie formula fortified with banana peel powder. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 11(3), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v11i3.618

Saaty, T. L. (2010). The Eigenvector In Lay Language 2 . What we learn when we have measurement. 2(2), 163–169.

Singh, L. P., & Singh, S. (2019). Strategic enhancement of workplace safety in small scale manufacturing industries using AHP approach. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 11(2), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v11i2.621

Sitanggang, Rianto dan Sibagariang, S. (2019). Model Pengambilan Keputusan Dengan Teknik Metode. 4(1), 44–50.

Sudrajat, B. (2018). Pemilihan Pegawai Berprestasi Dengan Menggunakan Metode Profile Matching. Journal of Information System, Applied, Management, Accounting and Research, 2(4), 20–28.

The, F. O. R., Person, L. A. Y., & Lipovetsky, S. (1936). An Interpretation Of The AHP Eigenvector Solution GfK Custom Research North America 8401 Golden Valley Rd ., Minneapolis , MN 55427 , USA 2 . The AHP solution and its interpretation for the maximum eigenvalue λ yields the principal eigenvector α which ser. 2(2), 158–162.

Topcu, I., & Ozaydin, O. (2020). MCDM2019 special topics articles. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 12(1), 2–2. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v12i1.754

Yalcin, G. D., & Ozturk, Z. (2020). Determining the area sizes of each product category in a department store using multi-criteria decision making methodologies. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 12(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v12i1.602

Downloads


Crossmark Updates

How to Cite

Akmaludin, A., Sihombing , E. G. ., Dewi, L. S. ., Rinawati , R. ., & Arisawati, E. . . (2022). Collaboration of Profile Matching and MCDM-AHP Methods on Employee Selection for Promotion. Sinkron : Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 6(2), 321-332. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v7i1.11203

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>