Comparison of Performance of K-Nearest Neighbors and Neural Network Algorithm in Bitcoin Price Prediction

Authors

  • Eko Aziz Apriadi Institut Informatika dan Bisnis Darmajaya
  • Sriyanto Institut Informatika dan Bisnis Darmajaya
  • Sri Lestari Institut Informatika dan Bisnis Darmajaya
  • Suhendro Yusuf Irianto Institut Informatika dan Bisnis Darmajaya

DOI:

10.33395/sinkron.v8i2.13418

Keywords:

K-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN), Neural Network, Bitcoin Price Prediction, Root Mean Square Error (RSME), Mean Absolute Error (MAE)

Abstract

This research evaluates and compares the performance of two prediction methods, namely K-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN) and Neural Network, in the context of Bitcoin price prediction. Historical Bitcoin price data is used as input to train and test both algorithms. Experimental results show that the K-NN algorithm produces a Root Mean Square Error (RSME) of 389,770 and a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 89,261, while the Neural Network has an RSME of 614,825 and an MAE of 284,190. Performance comparison analysis shows that, on this dataset, K-NN has better performance in predicting Bitcoin prices compared to Neural Network. These findings provide important insights for the selection of crypto asset price prediction models, especially Bitcoin, in financial and investment environments

GS Cited Analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anggada Maulana. (2018). Konsep Dasar Data Mining. Konsep Data Mining, 1, 1–16.

Iii, B. A. B., & Teori, L. (n.d.). Landaasan teori cryptocurrancy. 9–41.

James A.F Stoner, 2018 : 41). (1988). Landasan Teori اديدج. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik, 13, 17–39.

Khairiyah, A. (2020). Klasifikasi Jenis Buah Jambu Berdasarkan Daun Menggunakan Metode Principal Component Analysis. 18–18.

Ley 25.632. (2002). No Title No Title No Title. 10–66.

Luxmana, D. B., & Oktafiyani, M. (2022). Analisis Fundamental Cryptocurrency Terhadap Fluktuasi Harga Pada Masa Pandemi. Dinamika Akuntansi Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 11(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.35315/dakp.v11i1.8952

Nengsih, W. (2019). Analisa Akurasi Permodelan Supervised Dan Unsupervised Learning Menggunakan Data Mining. Sebatik, 23(2), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v23i2.771

Penelitian, L. B. (2008). Bab I . 1–120.

Perbandingan, A., Naive, A., Mendapatkan, M. U., Desa, B. D., Pasca, P., Magister, S., Komputer, I., Tinggi, S., Informatika, M., Komputer, D. A. N., & Mandiri, N. (2018). Analisis perbandingan algoritma naive bayes , random forest dan c.45 dalam klasifikasi kelayakan masyarakat untuk mendapatkan bantuan dana desa.

Syafarina, G. A. (2016). Penerapan Algoritma Neural Network Dalam Menentukan Prioritas Pengembangan Jalan Di Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan. Technologia : Jurnal Ilmiah, 7(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.31602/tji.v7i2.618

Wahyu, F., & Hendrik, B. (2023). Perbandingan Algoritma Time Series Dan Fuzzy Inference System Dalam Analisis Data Deret Waktu. Jurnal Penelitian Teknologi Informasi Dan Sains, 1(3), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.54066/jptis.v1i3.711

Downloads


Crossmark Updates

How to Cite

Apriadi, E. A., Sriyanto, Lestari, S. ., & Yusuf Irianto, S. (2024). Comparison of Performance of K-Nearest Neighbors and Neural Network Algorithm in Bitcoin Price Prediction. Sinkron : Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 8(2), 617-622. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i2.13418