Comparative Evaluation of YOLOv8 and YOLOv11 for Student Behavior Detection in Classroom CCTV Environments

Authors

  • Maya Sofhia Universitas Prima Indonesia

DOI:

10.33395/sinkron.v10i1.15648

Keywords:

Student behavior, CCTV monitoring, Yolov8, Yolov11

Abstract

Monitoring student behavior during classroom learning is important for supporting learning quality and teacher performance. This study presents a pilot comparison between YOLOv8 and YOLOv11 for detecting student classroom behaviors from CCTV images. Six elementary behaviors are consistently defined and used throughout the work: lookup, raise-hand, read, stand, turn-head, and write. The available SCB dataset contains 4,934 labeled images, but this study deliberately uses a front-facing subset of 100 images that best represent clear posture and behavior. After augmentation, the dataset grows to 220 images, split into 180 training, 30 validation, and 10 testing images. Both models are trained for 25 epochs on a T4 GPU with comparable configurations. At the detector level, YOLOv11 achieves higher mean average precision (mAP) of 42.9% compared to 28.9% for YOLOv8. At the behavior level, overall classification accuracy on the test set is 43.3% for YOLOv8 and 37.5% for YOLOv11. These results indicate a trade-off: YOLOv11 provides stronger bounding-box detection performance, while YOLOv8 produces slightly more stable behavior-level predictions on this very small and imbalanced dataset. The study emphasizes that these findings are exploratory baselines rather than definitive benchmarks, because the dataset is small and no statistical significance testing is performed. Future work must use a larger portion of the SCB dataset, more balanced class distributions, repeated experiments, and statistical analysis to obtain more robust conclusion.

GS Cited Analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alif, M. A. R. (2024). YOLOv11 for Vehicle Detection: Advancements, Performance, and Applications in Intelligent Transportation Systems. http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22898

Anh, B. N., Son, N. T., Lam, P. T., Chi, L. P., Tuan, N. H., Dat, N. C., Trung, N. H., Aftab, M. U., & Dinh, T. Van. (2019). A Computer-vision based application for student behavior monitoring in classroom. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9224729

Bisla, T., Shukla, R., Dhawan, M., Islam, M. R., & Horio, K. (2024). Jumping behavior Analysis after Identification of Daycare Children’s Activities utilizing YOLOv8 Algorithm. Proceedings of CONECCT 2024 - 10th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Computing and Communication Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONECCT62155.2024.10677280

Chen, Y., Li, W., Weng, H., Zheng, J., Qian, Z., Huang, J., Lun, J., Chen, Q., Zhang, Q., & Wu, Y. (2023). Research on Intelligent Teaching Mode Based on Classroom Behavior Monitoring of Body Motion. Journal of Modern Educational Research, 2, 15. https://doi.org/10.53964/jmer.2023015

Cui, Y., & Zou, H. (2023). Detection of Abnormal Behavioral States in Student Learning Based on Video Surveillance. 2023 International Conference on Data Science and Network Security, ICDSNS 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDSNS58469.2023.10245238

Dewan, M. A. A., Murshed, M., & Lin, F. (2019). Engagement detection in online learning: a review. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-018-0080-z

Fassold, H., Gutjahr, K., Weber, A., & Perko, R. (2023). A real-time algorithm for human action recognition in RGB and thermal video. http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.01567

Filipa, A., Pereira Artífice, V., Sarraipa, J., & Jardim-Goncalves, R. (2021). Improvement of Student Attention Monitoring Supported by Precision Sensing in Learning Management Systems. www.intechopen.com

Hussain, M., Zhu, W., Zhang, W., & Abidi, S. M. R. (2018). Student Engagement Predictions in an e-Learning System and Their Impact on Student Course Assessment Scores. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6347186

Jia, Q., & He, J. (2024). Student Behavior Recognition in Classroom Based on Deep Learning. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 14(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177981

Kale, G. V., Choudhari, A., Balapure, R., Sarode, S., & Wakode, M. S. (2024). Real-time Detection of Students’ Cellphone Usage During Lectures and Behavioral Analysis. Proceedings - 2024 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Applications, ICCICA 2024, 536–540. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCICA60014.2024.10584944

Khanam, R., & Hussain, M. (2024). YOLOv11: An Overview of the Key Architectural Enhancements. http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17725

Li, P., Bo, S., Zhang, H., & Bin, X. (2024). Student classroom behavior detection based on YOLOv8 multi-modal fusion. 2024 7th International Conference on Computer Information Science and Application Technology, CISAT 2024, 931–935. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISAT62382.2024.10695405

Ling, W. (2022). Automatic Recognition of Students’ Classroom Behavior Based on Computer Vision. Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.25236/ajcis.2022.050205

Parkavi, A., Pushpalatha, M. N., & Alex, S. A. (2024). Deep Learning Classroom Management System for Exam Monitoring and Student Behavior Detection. 8th International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud), I-SMAC 2024 - Proceedings, 2004–2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/I-SMAC61858.2024.10714864

Pham, H. H., Khoudour, L., Crouzil, A., Zegers, P., & Velastin, S. A. (2022). Video-based Human Action Recognition using Deep Learning: A Review. http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.03775

Rajasegaran, J., Pavlakos, G., Kanazawa, A., Feichtenhofer, C., & Malik, J. (2023). On the Benefits of 3D Pose and Tracking for Human Action Recognition. https://brjathu.github.io/LART

Rao, M. V. P. (2023). Student Behaviour Monitoring System. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 11(5), 779–787. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.51458

Sun, Z., Ke, Q., Rahmani, H., Bennamoun, M., Wang, G., & Liu, J. (2023). Human Action Recognition From Various Data Modalities: A Review. In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (Vol. 45, Issue 3, pp. 3200–3225). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3183112

Trabelsi, Z., Alnajjar, F., Parambil, M. M. A., Gochoo, M., & Ali, L. (2023). Real-Time Attention Monitoring System for Classroom: A Deep Learning Approach for Student’s Behavior Recognition. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7010048

Wang, Z., Yao, J., Zeng, C., Wu, W., Xu, H., & Yang, Y. (2022). YOLOv5 Enhanced Learning Behavior Recognition and Analysis in Smart Classroom with Multiple Students. IEIR 2022 - IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Education and Intelligent Research, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEIR56323.2022.10050042

Yang, F. (2025). SCB-Dataset: A Dataset for Detecting Student and Teacher Classroom Behavior. http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02488

Yang, S. Q., Chen, Y. H., Zhang, Z. Y., & Chen, J. H. (2022). Student in-class behaviors detection and analysis system based on CBAM-YOLOv5. 2022 7th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Signal Processing, ICSP 2022, 440–443. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSP54964.2022.9778630

Yin Albert, C. C., Sun, Y., Li, G., Peng, J., Ran, F., Wang, Z., & Zhou, J. (2022). Identifying and Monitoring Students’ Classroom Learning Behavior Based on Multisource Information. Mobile Information Systems, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9903342

Zaletelj, J., & Košir, A. (2017). Predicting students’ attention in the classroom from Kinect facial and body features. Eurasip Journal on Image and Video Processing, 2017(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13640-017-0228-8

Zhang, G., Bortoletto, M., Hu, Z., Shi, L., Bâce, M., & Bulling, A. (2023). Exploring Natural Language Processing Methods for Interactive Behaviour Modelling. http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.16039

Zhou, H., Jiang, F., Si, J., Xiong, L., & Lu, H. (2023). STUART: INDIVIDUALIZED CLASSROOM OBSERVATION OF STUDENTS WITH AUTOMATIC BEHAVIOR RECOGNITION AND TRACKING. https://github.com/hnuzhy/StuArt.

Downloads


Crossmark Updates

How to Cite

Sofhia, M. . (2026). Comparative Evaluation of YOLOv8 and YOLOv11 for Student Behavior Detection in Classroom CCTV Environments. Sinkron : Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 10(1), 181-187. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v10i1.15648