Intelligent Fault Diagnosis in Multi-Setpoint Water Level Systems Using LSTM-Autoencoder

Authors

  • Muhammad Giriarda Abrari Departement of Automation Engineering, Politeknik Manufaktur Bandung, Indonesia
  • Fitria Suryatini Departement of Automation Engineering, Politeknik Manufaktur Bandung, Indonesia
  • Hasbi Fajrul Hakim Departement of Automation Engineering, Politeknik Manufaktur Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

10.33395/sinkron.v10i3.16211

Keywords:

LSTM-Autoencoder, Fault Detection, Multi-Setpoint Control, Feature Engineering, Anomaly Detection

Abstract

Fault detection in multi-setpoint industrial process control systems is complicated by the fact that normal sensor behavior shifts substantially across operating points, making conventional threshold-based alarms and single-condition models unreliable when setpoints change frequently. Recent studies on LSTM-Autoencoder for industrial anomaly detection have demonstrated promising results, yet most are evaluated under fixed operating conditions and do not examine how feature engineering choices affect detection performance across diverse setpoints. This study aims to determine whether physics-informed derived features improve LSTM-AE fault detection performance in a real-time multi-setpoint water level control system, and whether the improvement holds under practical deployment conditions. The proposed framework augments seven raw PLC sensor readings with three derived variables: delta flow, level error, and frequency-per-flow and applies a per-setpoint windowing strategy to prevent cross-setpoint data contamination during training. An ablation study compares the eleven-feature model against a seven-feature baseline under three labeling scenarios reflecting varying preprocessing quality. The eleven-feature model achieves an AUC of 1.0000 and F1-score of 0.9993 under onset-cut evaluation, and reduces the false positive rate from 18.48% to 15.21% under corrected labeling while maintaining perfect recall. Real-time validation across thirty fault injection experiments confirms a 100% detection rate with a mean latency of 6.37 ± 2.04 seconds, 38.2% faster than the baseline. These results confirm that derived features meaningfully improve both classification quality and temporal detection performance, though adaptive thresholding at high-variability setpoints remains an open challenge for future work.

GS Cited Analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdennebi, A., Tuncay, A., Yilmaz, C., Koyuncu, A., & Gungor, O. (2023). LSTM-AE for Anomaly Detection on Multivariate Telemetry Data. Proceedings - 2023 IEEE/ACIS 21st International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications, SERA 2023, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/SERA57763.2023.10197673

Adhitya, M. H., & Ihsan, A. F. (2025). Anomaly Detection of Oil and Gas Pipeline Operational Data Using Multi-Layer LSTM Autoencoder Method. 2025 5th International Conference on Intelligent Cybernetics Technology & Applications (ICICyTA), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICyTA68677.2025.11362820

Aslam, M. M., Tufail, A., De Silva, L. C., Haji Mohd Apong, R. A. A., & Namoun, A. (2024). An improved autoencoder-based approach for anomaly detection in industrial control systems. Systems Science and Control Engineering, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21642583.2024.2334303

Belay, M. A., Blakseth, S. S., Rasheed, A., & Salvo Rossi, P. (2023). Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for IoT-Based Multivariate Time Series: Existing Solutions, Performance Analysis and Future Directions. Sensors, 23(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23052844

Cui, Y., Member, S., Ab, G., & Tjernberg, L. B. (2018). An Anomaly Detection Approach Based on Machine Learning and SCADA Data for Condition Monitoring of Wind Turbines. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS), 1–6.

Essamlali, I., Nhaila, H., & Khaili, M. El. (2024). Heliyon Advances in machine learning and IoT for water quality monitoring : A comprehensive review. Heliyon, 10(6), e27920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27920

Goetz, C., & Humm, B. (2023). Decentralized Real-Time Anomaly Detection in Cyber-Physical Production Systems under Industry Constraints. Sensors, 23(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23094207

Kammoun, M., Kammoun, A., & Abid, M. (2023). LSTM-AE-WLDL: Unsupervised LSTM Auto-Encoders for Leak Detection and Location in Water Distribution Networks. Water Resources Management, 37(2), 731–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03397-6

Karadimos, P., & Anthopoulos, L. (2023). Machine Learning-Based Energy Consumption Estimation of Wastewater Treatment Plants in Greece. Energies, 16(21), 7408. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16217408

Khalid Fahmi, A. T. W., Reza Kashyzadeh, K., & Ghorbani, S. (2024). Fault detection in the gas turbine of the Kirkuk power plant: An anomaly detection approach using DLSTM-Autoencoder. Engineering Failure Analysis, 160(October 2023), 108213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108213

Kim, D., & Heo, T. Y. (2022). Anomaly Detection with Feature Extraction Based on Machine Learning Using Hydraulic System IoT Sensor Data. Sensors, 22(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072479

Lee, D., Choo, H., & Jeong, J. (2023). Leak Detection and Classification of Water Pipeline Data Using LSTM Auto-Encoder with Xavier Initialization. 2023 IEEE/ACIS 8th International Conference on Big Data, Cloud Computing, and Data Science, BCD 2023, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/BCD57833.2023.10466341

Nelago Kanyama, M., Bhunu Shava, F., Gamundani, A. M., & Hartmann, A. (2024). Enhancing Anomaly Detection in Smart Water Metering Networks with LSTM-Autoencoder and Data Augmentation Techniques. Proceedings of 2024 4th International Multidisciplinary Information Technology and Engineering Conference, IMITEC 2024, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMITEC60221.2024.10851168

Nizam, H., Zafar, S., Lv, Z., Wang, F., & Hu, X. (2022). Real-Time Deep Anomaly Detection Framework for Multivariate Time-Series Data in Industrial IoT. IEEE Sensors Journal, 22(23), 22836–22849. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2022.3211874

Nugraha, N. W., Suryatini, F., Lilansa, N., & Madani, F. A. (2025). Implementation of Industrial IoT Integration Using Node-RED and PLC on Cascade Control Level and Flow Plant. 11(6), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i6.11623

Qu, Y., Fu, S., Yong, M., Tian, J., Lv, Z., & Li, R. (2025). Health Indicator Construction and Remaining Useful Life Prediction Based on MSC-LSTM-AE Model for Working Bearings. IEEE Sensors Journal, 25(9), 15525–15535. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2025.3548675

Soni, M., Khan, I. R., Basir, S., Chadha, R., Alguno, A. C., & Bhowmik, T. (2022). Light-Weighted Deep Learning Model to Detect Fault in IoT-Based Industrial Equipment. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2455259

Sunal, C. E., Dyo, V., & Velisavljevic, V. (2022). Review of Machine Learning Based Fault Detection for Centrifugal Pump Induction Motors. IEEE Access, 10(June), 71344–71355. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3187718

Wei, Y., Jang-Jaccard, J., Xu, W., Sabrina, F., Camtepe, S., & Boulic, M. (2023). LSTM-Autoencoder-Based Anomaly Detection for Indoor Air Quality Time-Series Data. IEEE Sensors Journal, 23(4), 3787–3800. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2022.3230361

Zhao, Z., Xiao, Z., & Tao, J. (2024). MSDG: Multi-Scale Dynamic Graph Neural Network for Industrial Time Series Anomaly Detection. Sensors, 24(22), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24227218

Downloads


Crossmark Updates

How to Cite

Abrari, M. G. ., Suryatini, F., & Hakim, H. F. (2026). Intelligent Fault Diagnosis in Multi-Setpoint Water Level Systems Using LSTM-Autoencoder. Sinkron : Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 10(3), 1721-1732. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v10i3.16211