AHP-SWARA Implementation Method for Evaluation and Selection Employee Promotion
DOI:
10.33395/sinkron.v9i2.14319Keywords:
AHP, Eigenvector, Index, Multi-criteria, SWARAAbstract
The evaluation process of employee selection is very important for organizations that want to carry out quality leadership, the purpose of this study is to objectively prove the results of the selection of job promotions that have been evaluated continuously every time leadership occurs. The evaluation results of the leadership selection process become routine, so that the results of leadership promotions can provide improvisation to organizations that are increasingly advancing towards future leadership targets. The proposed method for the evaluation and selection process uses the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and specifically Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA). Both of these methods utilize expert intervention in providing input in providing assessments of multi-criteria and alternatives. So that the priority of the criteria is carried out by an index process similar to that owned by the two methods, thus providing more optimal results for decision-making support. The assessment of the results requires seven criteria and twenty-four alternatives. The results obtained require two index processes for both criteria and alternatives. The first rank is determined by the weight of the calculation results of the seven criteria and alternative assessments from experts. The first rank of twenty-six employees was given to K20 with a weight of 0.932 and followed by K2 with a weight of 0.08. Thus, job promotion can be developed with a double index that can provide optimal results in supporting job promotion decision making
Downloads
References
Akinlalu, A. A., Obideyi, O. I., Afolabi, D. O., Adiat, K. A., & Adeola, O. J. (2024). Results in Earth Sciences Gold prospectivity mapping using “ SWARA ” model on geophysical datasets in parts of Ilesa Schist belt , Southwestern Nigeria. 2(January).
Akmaludin, A., Samudi, S., Baidawi, T., Dalis, S., Suriyanto, A. D., & Widianto, K. (2024). MCDM-AHP and ELECTRE collaboration apps for the best vendor selection technique. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 13(4), 2878–2889. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v13i4.7545
Akmaludin, A., Sihombing, E. G., Rinawati, R., Handayanna, F., Sari Dewi, L., & Arisawati, E. (2023). Generation 4.0 of the programmer selection decision support system: MCDM-AHP and ELECTRE-elimination recommendations. International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences, 12(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijaas.v12.i1.pp48-59
Akmaludin, A., Suriyanto, A. D., Iriadi, N., Sukendar, T., & Santoso, B. (2022). AHP-SMART Method as Evaluation Decision Support for Employee Promotion. SinkrOn, 7(2), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v7i1.11228
Alves, Y. N., Rocha, D. A. da, Vianna, M. de F. D., & dos Santos, M. (2024). Using the hybrid method AHP-PROMETHEE to allocate teaching posts. Procedia Computer Science, 242, 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.08.261
Becker, J., & Becker, A. (2024). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Graphical analysis of consistency in the AHP / ANP pairwise Graphical analysis of consistency in decision the AHP / ANP pairwise comparison matrices of criteria or alternatives comparison matrices of criteria or decision alternativ. Procedia Computer Science, 246, 4805–4814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.346
Boira Lopez, A., & Connelly, S. (2024). The role of focal leaders in collective leadership behavior: A historiometric analysis of socialized and personalized leaders. European Management Journal, August. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2024.08.006
Deveci, M., Varouchakis, E. A., Brito-Parada, P. R., Mishra, A. R., Rani, P., Bolgkoranou, M., & Galetakis, M. (2023). Evaluation of risks impeding sustainable mining using Fermatean fuzzy score function based SWARA method. Applied Soft Computing, 139, 110220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110220
Donegan, H. A., & Dodd, F. J. (1991). A note on saaty’s random indexes. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 15(10), 135–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(91)90098-R
Dutta, P., Saikia, B., & Borah, G. (2024). A novel approach for arithmetic operations and ranking of generalized fuzzy numbers with application. Decision Analytics Journal, 10(December 2023), 100428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2024.100428
Erdogan, S. A., Šaparauskas, J., & Turskis, Z. (2017). Decision Making in Construction Management: AHP and Expert Choice Approach. Procedia Engineering, 172, 270–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.111
Franek, J., & Kresta, A. (2014). Judgment Scales and Consistency Measure in AHP. Procedia Economics and Finance, 12(March), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00332-3
Furtado, S., & Johnson, C. R. (2024). Pairwise comparison matrices with uniformly ordered efficient vectors. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 173(February), 109265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2024.109265
Gesmundo, F. (2016). Geometric aspects of Iterated Matrices Multiplication. Journal of Algebra, 461, 42–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2016.04.028
Kang, D., Devi, S. A., Felix, A., Narayanamoorthy, S., Kalaiselvan, S., Balaenu, D., & Ahmadian, A. (2022). Intuitionistic fuzzy MAUT-BW Delphi method for medication service robot selection during COVID-19. Operations Research Perspectives, 9(July), 100258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2022.100258
Liu, Q. (2022). Identifying and correcting the defects of the Saaty analytic hierarchy/network process: A comparative study of the Saaty analytic hierarchy/network process and the Markov chain-based analytic network process. Operations Research Perspectives, 9(July), 100244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2022.100244
Ma, X., Chen, J., Dong, W., & Su, Q. (2024). Chief accountants weigh in: How professional leadership of SOEs influence investment efficiency. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95(PB), 103457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103457
Matraś, P., Wyk, L. Van, & Ziembowski, M. (2024). The structure of subalgebras of full matrices algebras over a field satisfying the identity. Journal of Algebra, 657, 159–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2024.05.023
Nosal, K., & Solecka, K. (2014). Application of AHP method for multi-criteria evaluation of variants of the integration of Urban public transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 3(July), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.006
Ogita, T., & Aishima, K. (2020). Iterative refinement for singular value decomposition based on matrices multiplication. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 369, 112512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2019.112512
Orovitz, J., Slutsky, R., & Vigdorovich, I. (2025). The space of traces of the free group and free products of matrices algebras. Advances in Mathematics, 461(101052954), 110053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2024.110053
Salvador, G., Moura, M., Campos, P., Cardoso, P., Espadinha-Cruz, P., & Godina, R. (2024). ELECTRE applied in supplier selection - a literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 232, 1759–1768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.01.174
Soltani, E., & Mirzaei Aliabadi, M. (2023). Risk assessment of firefighting job using hybrid SWARA-ARAS methods in fuzzy environment. Heliyon, 9(11), e22230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22230
Taylor, C., Mitchell, C., Kaneko, H., Foley, B., & Shaw, J. (2024). Characteristics of nursing educators’ professional competency standards: A scoping review. Nurse Education in Practice, 80(September), 104130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104130
Tømte, C. E. (2024). Conceptualisation of professional digital competence for school leaders in schools with 1:1 coverage of digital devices. Computers and Education, 222(August). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105151
Vern, Y. R., Mansor, M. R., & Shaharuzaman, M. A. (2024). Natural Fibre Composite Selection for Two-stroke Marine Engine Under-piston Door using Hybrid AHP and TOPSIS Methods. International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2024.07.006
Vieira, A. F. L. E., & Joia, L. A. (2024). The social representation of digital transformation: The IT professionals’ perspective. Heliyon, 10(11), e31591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31591
Yang, X., & Chen, Z. (2023). A hybrid approach based on Monte Carlo simulation-VIKOR method for water quality assessment. Ecological Indicators, 150(October 2022), 110202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110202
Yunus, R. M., Samadi, Z., Yusop, N. M., & Omar, D. (2013). Expert Choice for Ranking Heritage Streets. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 101, 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.220
Zhang, R., Gao, C., Chen, X., Li, F., Yi, D., & Wu, Y. (2023). Genetic algorithm optimised Hadamard product method for inconsistency judgement matrices adjustment in AHP and automatic analysis system development. Expert Systems with Applications, 211(January 2022), 118689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118689
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Akmaludin, Adhi Dharma Suriyanto, Kudiantoro Widianto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.