Decision-Making Framework Using MARCOS for Evaluating Sealing Machines in Small and Medium Enterprises
DOI:
10.33395/sinkron.v9i1.14367Keywords:
Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises; Sealer Machines; MARCOS Method; Production Efficiency; Packaging TechnologyAbstract
In the era of globalization, Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) hold a vital position in Indonesia's economy, contributing significantly to GDP and employment. Despite their importance, MSMEs need help in selecting appropriate sealer machines, which affects production efficiency and product quality. There are six different kinds of sealer machines that are looked at in this study. They are manual, vertical, continuous, horizontal semi-automatic, impulse, and vacuum. The MARCOS method is used to find the best option. Results indicate that the Impulse Sealer Machine (A5) is the most suitable, with a Ki value of 1.7, followed by the Continuous Sealer Machine (A3), with a Ki of 1.63. Machines such as Manual (A1), Vertical (A2), and Vacuum (A6) scored 1.6, while the Horizontal Semi-Automatic Sealer Machine (A4) ranked lowest at 1.36. These findings provide MSMEs with practical guidance for selecting sealer machines that enhance production efficiency and competitiveness in the global market while also contributing to the development of packaging technology research.
Downloads
References
Adizue, U. L., Agbadah, S. E., Ibeagha, D. C., & Falade, Y. O. (2017). Design and Construction of an Automated Adjustable-can foil Sealing Machine. J. Engineering and Applied Sciences, 4(9), 5–13. www.ijeas.org
Bhattacharya, I., & Ramachandran, A. (2021). Lean manufacturing techniques – implementation in indian msmes and benefits realized thereof. Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences, 28(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.56042/ijems.v28i1.30113
Campos, M. P., & Reis, M. S. (2020). Data preprocessing for multiblock modelling – A systematization with new methods. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 199(December 2019), 103959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2020.103959
Dewi, M. U., Mekaniwati, A., Nurendah, Y., Cakranegara, P., & Arief, A. S. (2020). Globalization challenges of micro small and medium enterprises. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(11), 1909–1915.
Febrianti, B., Kussudyarsana, K., & Maimun, M. H. (2022). The Effect of Social Media, Packaging, and Product Quality on MSME Sales Performance. Proceedings of the International Conference on Economics and Business Studies (ICOEBS 2022), 655(Icoebs), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220602.011
Hollmann, S., Frohme, M., Endrullat, C., Kremer, A., D’Elia, D., Regierer, B., & Nechyporenko, A. (2020). Ten simple rules on how to write a standard operating procedure. PLoS Computational Biology, 16(9), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008095
Ilhan, I., Turan, D., Gibson, I., & ten Klooster, R. (2021). Understanding the factors affecting the seal integrity in heat sealed flexible food packages: A review. Packaging Technology and Science, 34(6), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2564
Jadhav, P., & Ekbote, N. (2021). Implementation of lean techniques in the packaging machine to optimize the cycle time of the machine. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46(xxxx), 10275–10281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.162
Jayasuriya, A., Perera, R., Thihara, I., & De Silva, S. (2022). Semi-Automated Spice Packaging Machine for Middle Scale Business in Sri Lanka. 01(February), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.54389/ehom7983
Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2021). Determination of objective weights using a new method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC). Symmetry, 13(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13040525
Liu, S., Li, D., He, X., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Structure design study of vacuum magnetic fluid seal. Frontiers in Materials, 9(August), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2022.932697
Novotny, T. E., Lum, K., Smith, E., Wang, V., & Barnes, R. (2009). Cigarettes butts and the case for an environmental policy on hazardous cigarette waste. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6(5), 1691–1705. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6051691
Ørstavik, D., Nordahl, I., & Tibballs, J. E. (2001). Dimensional change following setting of root canal sealer materials. Dental Materials, 17(6), 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00011-2
Patnaik, P. K., Swain, P. T. R., Mishra, S. K., Purohit, A., & Biswas, S. (2020). Composite material selection for structural applications based on AHP-MOORA approach. Materials Today: Proceedings, 33(xxxx), 5659–5663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.063
Stankovi´, M., Stevi´, Ž., Das, D. K., Suboti´, M., & Pamuˇcar, D. (2020). mathematics A New Fuzzy MARCOS Method for Road Tra ffi c Risk Analysis. Mathematics, 8, 457.
Sudarta. (2022). 済無No Title No Title No Title. 16(1), 1–23.
TRAINING AND MENTORING ON PACKAGING OPTIMIZATION OF. (2023). 4(1), 1–15.
Trung, D. D. (2022). Development of data normalization methods for multi-criteria decision making: applying for MARCOS method. Manufacturing Review, 9. https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2022019
Winati, F. D., Utami, G. P., Rakhmadani, D. P., Hidayatullah, J. A., & Puddin, R. A. (2024). Economic Independence Improvement of Melati MSMEs in Kedungbenda Village Through the Use of Production Technology and Digital Branding. 4, 1799–1813.
Yu, Z., Shevchenko, S., Radchenko, M., Shevchenko, O., & Radchenko, A. (2022). Methodology of Designing Sealing Systems for Highly Loaded Rotary Machines. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315828
Downloads
|
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marysca Shintya, Linda Marlinda, Komaruddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Muhammad Khoiruddin harahap
Google Scholar 
Moraref
PKP Index
Garuda Kemdikbud
Indonesia OneSearch
OCLC Worldcat
Dimensions
Index Copernicus
Scilit
