Evaluation of Green Marketing Strategy Using Fuzzy AHP-Based Decision Support System

Authors

  • Marsono STMIK Triguna Dharma
  • Asyahri Hadi Nasyuha Universitas Teknologi Digital Indonesia Yogyakarta
  • Evi Rosalina Widyayanti Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Widya Wihana
  • Meng-Yun Hadi Chung National Taipei University of Technology

DOI:

10.33395/sinkron.v10i3.16277

Keywords:

Green marketing, Fuzzy AHP, Decision support system, Multi-criteria evaluation, Sustainability

Abstract

Growing environmental awareness among consumers has encouraged companies to integrate ecological considerations into their marketing activities. However, many firms still find it difficult to determine which green marketing strategy should be prioritised, because the decision involves multiple conflicting criteria and a high degree of subjective human judgment. This study designs and applies a decision support system based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) to evaluate and rank green marketing strategy alternatives for a consumer goods company. The decision problem was structured into a three-level hierarchy consisting of the main goal, five evaluation criteria, namely green product, green price, green promotion, green distribution, and green corporate image, and four strategy alternatives. Expert judgments were gathered through pairwise comparison questionnaires using linguistic variables that were converted into triangular fuzzy numbers. Chang’s extent analysis was applied to compute the fuzzy synthetic extent and the degree of possibility, and the priority weights were normalised and verified through a consistency check (CR = 0.095, below the 0.10 threshold). To strengthen the validity of the recommendation, the alternative ranking obtained from FAHP was cross-validated against the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and TOPSIS methods. The results indicate that green product is the most important criterion (0.327), followed by green promotion (0.277) and green corporate image (0.210), while sustainable packaging is identified as the most preferred strategy alternative (0.294). All three methods produced an identical ranking, and a sensitivity analysis confirmed that the ranking remained stable under reasonable variations in the criteria weights. The proposed decision support system, whose architecture and interface are also presented, offers a transparent, consistent, and reproducible tool that helps managers allocate resources to the most effective green marketing strategy.

GS Cited Analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Fozaie, M. T., & Wahid, H. (2022). A Guide to Integrating Expert Opinion and Fuzzy AHP When Generating Weights for Composite Indices. Advances in Fuzzy Systems, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3396862

Aungkulanon, P., Atthirawong, W., & Luangpaiboon, P. (2023). Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process for Strategic Decision Making in Electric Vehicle Adoption. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15087003

Awasthi, A., Govindan, K., & Gold, S. (2018). Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.013

Baffo, I., Leonardi, M., Bossone, B., Camarda, M. E., D’Alberti, V., & Travaglioni, M. (2023). A decision support system for measuring and evaluating solutions for sustainable development. Sustainable Futures, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2023.100109

Balaskas, S., Panagiotarou, A., & Rigou, M. (2023). Impact of Environmental Concern, Emotional Appeals, and Attitude toward the Advertisement on the Intention to Buy Green Products: The Case of Younger Consumer Audiences. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713204

Beheshtinia, M. A., Sayadinia, S., & Fathi, M. (2023). Identifying and prioritizing marketing strategies for the building energy management systems using a hybrid fuzzy MCDM technique. Energy Science and Engineering, 11(11), 4324–4348. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1584

Correia, E., Sousa, S., Viseu, C., & Larguinho, M. (2023). Analysing the Influence of Green Marketing Communication in Consumers’ Green Purchase Behaviour. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021356

Geng, Y., & Maimaituerxun, M. (2022). Research Progress of Green Marketing in Sustainable Consumption based on CiteSpace Analysis. SAGE Open, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221119835

Kiyak, D., & Grigoliene, R. (2023). Analysis of the Conceptual Frameworks of Green Marketing. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 15, Number 21). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115630

Li, L., Pedrycz, W., Qu, T., & Li, Z. (2020). Fuzzy associative memories with autoencoding mechanisms. Knowledge-Based Systems, 191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105090

Mohd Suki, N., & Mohd Suki, N. (2019). Examination of peer influence as a moderator and predictor in explaining green purchase behaviour in a developing country. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 833–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.218

Nasyuha, A. H., Hutasuhut, M., & Ramadhan, M. (2019). Penerapan Metode Fuzzy Mamdani Untuk Menentukan Stok Produk Herbal Berdasarkan Permintaan dan Penjualan. 3(4), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v3i4.1354

Nasyuha, A. H., Subagyo, A. A., & Wahyudi, U. D. (2025). Penerapan Analytical Hierarchy Process Dalam Pemilihan Dosen Terbaik Universitas Teknologi Digital Indonesia ( UTDI ). JURNAL ILMIAH FIFO, 17(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.22441/fifo.2025.v17i2.003

Pardiyono, R., & Indrayani, R. (2019). Decision support system to choose private higher education based on marketing mix model criteria in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 508, 012112. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/508/1/012112

Putra, A. J., Kartika Pertiwi, T., Ichsanuddin, D., Manajemen, M., Ekonomi, F., & Bisnis, D. (2025). MARKETING MIX AND RELATIONSHIP MARKETING ON CUSTOMER LOYALTY WITH CUSTOMER SATISFACTION AS A MEDIATION VARIABLE AT BPRS BOTANI BINA RAHMAH BOGOR. https://doi.org/10.47353/ecbis.v3i6.253

Rawat, G., & Pande, M. C. (2024). Adoption of Green Marketing Strategies and Challenges in Sustainable Business Practices: Insights from Indian Companies. Journal of Corporate Governance, Insurance, and Risk Management, 11(2), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.56578/jcgirm110202

Rawat, S. S., Pant, S., Kumar, A., Ram, M., Sharma, H. K., & Kumar, A. (2022). A State-of-the-Art Survey on Analytical Hierarchy Process Applications in Sustainable Development. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, 7(6), 883–917. https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2022.7.6.056

Sarabi, E. P., & Darestani, S. A. (2021). Developing a decision support system for logistics service provider selection employing fuzzy MULTIMOORA & BWM in mining equipment manufacturing. Applied Soft Computing, 98, 106849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106849

Tarabieh, S. M. Z. A. (2021). The impact of greenwash practices over green purchase intention: The mediating effects of green confusion, Green perceived risk, and green trust. Management Science Letters, 451–464. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.9.022

Wang, C. N., Nguyen, N. A. T., Dang, T. T., & Lu, C. M. (2021). A compromised decision-making approach to third-party logistics selection in sustainable supply chain using fuzzy ahp and fuzzy vikor methods. Mathematics, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9080886

Yazdani, M., Pamucar, D., Chatterjee, P., & Chakraborty, S. (2020). Development of a decision support framework for sustainable freight transport system evaluation using rough numbers. International Journal of Production Research, 58(14), 4325–4351. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1651945

Downloads


Crossmark Updates

How to Cite

Marsono, M., Nasyuha, A. H. ., Widyayanti, E. R. ., & Chung, M.-Y. H. . (2026). Evaluation of Green Marketing Strategy Using Fuzzy AHP-Based Decision Support System. Sinkron : Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 10(3), 1536-1545. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v10i3.16277