Integrated Selection of Permanent Teacher Appointments Recommended MCDM-AHP and WASPAS Methods

Authors

  • Akmaludin STMIK Nusa Mandiri Jakarta
  • Erene Gernaria Sihombing Universitas Nusa Mandiri, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Rinawati Universitas Nusa Mandiri, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Linda Sari Dewi Universitas Nusa Mandiri, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Ester Arisawati Universitas Nusa Mandiri, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

10.33395/sinkron.v8i2.13063

Keywords:

Appointment teachers candidate, MCDM-AHP, WASPAS, Multi-criteria, optimization.

Abstract

The teacher's role is very important in improving the national learning system. Many honorary teachers are empowered in curriculum development in a number of schools who want to collaborate in improving the quality of their students. The purpose of this research is to provide rewards to honorary teachers who have long served for the progress of the nation in the world of education to be appointed as permanent teachers. The selection method was carried out through a criteria weighting technique with the MCDM-AHP method which was integrated with the WASPAS method. The technique of developing the MCDM-AHP method as an eigenvector measurement concept with proof of optimization through mathematical algebra matrices that is correlated with the Expert Choice application to get optimal values. The result optimization value is integrated with the WASPAS method as a determinant of the ranking system for permanent teacher candidates. This method is a unification of the concepts of the weight product model and weight sum model methods, so that it has special stages to support decision making with the WASPAS method. The results of selecting twelve honorary teachers for appointment as permanent teachers can be seen from the acquisition of the Qi optimization value as a ranking. The results of support for decision making for permanent teacher appointments with the highest optimization value were given to TC04 with a weight of 0.878; followed by a significant difference in the next rank. The findings of this study provide evidence that the integration of the MCDM-AHP and WASPAS methods provides continuous optimization results for decision-making support.

GS Cited Analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Baky, I., & Abo-Sinna, M. A. (2013). TOPSIS for bi-level MODM problems. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(3), 1004–1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.03.002

Abdrabo, K. I., Kantoush, S. A., Esmaiel, A., Saber, M., Sumi, T., Almamari, M., Elboshy, B., & Ghoniem, S. (2023). An integrated indicator-based approach for constructing an urban flood vulnerability index as an urban decision-making tool using the PCA and AHP techniques: A case study of Alexandria, Egypt. Urban Climate, 48(August 2022), 101426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101426

Abdullahi, A., Jothimani, M., Getahun, E., Gunalan, J., & Abebe, A. (2023). Assessment of potential groundwater Zones in the drought-prone Harawa catchment, Somali region, eastern Ethiopia using geospatial and AHP techniques. Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 26(3), 628–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2023.07.005

Ahmad, I., Kim, S. K., Lee, J., & Rho, J. J. (2020). Analytic hierarchy process model for the selection of optimal internet access technologies in rural Pakistan. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 12(2), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v12i2.712

Badulescu, Y., Tiwari, M. K., & Cheikhrouhou, N. (2022). MCDM approach to select IoT devices for the reverse logistics process in the Clinical Trials supply chain. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(10), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.365

Benítez, J., Delgado-Galván, X., Gutiérrez, J. A., & Izquierdo, J. (2011). Balancing consistency and expert judgment in AHP. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 54(7–8), 1785–1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2010.12.023

Benítez, Julio, Delgado-Galván, X., Izquierdo, J., & Pérez-García, R. (2011). Achieving matrix consistency in AHP through linearization. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35(9), 4449–4457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.03.013

Debnath, B., Bari, A. B. M. M., Haq, M. M., de Jesus Pacheco, D. A., & Khan, M. A. (2023). An integrated stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis and weighted aggregated sum product assessment framework for sustainable supplier selection in the healthcare supply chains. Supply Chain Analytics, 1(December 2022), 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2022.100001

Deretarla, Ö., Erdebilli, B., & Gündoğan, M. (2023). An integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Complex Proportional Assessment for vendor selection in supply chain management. Decision Analytics Journal, 6(August 2022), 100155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100155

Eskelson, T. C. (2020). How and Why Formal Education Originated in the Emergence of Civilization. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v9n2p29

Fan, S., Shi, W., Wang, N., & Liu, Y. (2011). MODM-based evaluation model of service quality in the Internet of Things. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 11(PART A), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2011.12.011

Franek, J., & Kresta, A. (2014). Judgment Scales and Consistency Measure in AHP. Procedia Economics and Finance, 12(March), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00332-3

Garai, T., & Garg, H. (2023). An interpreter ranking index-based MCDM technique for COVID-19 treatments under a bipolar fuzzy environment. Results in Control and Optimization, 12(June), 100242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rico.2023.100242

Hanaysha, J. R., Shriedeh, F. B., & In’airat, M. (2023). Impact of classroom environment, teacher competency, information and communication technology resources, and university facilities on student engagement and academic performance. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3(2), 100188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100188

Hema Surya, S., Nirmala, T., & Ganesan, K. (2023). Interval linear algebra – A new perspective. Journal of King Saud University - Science, 35(2), 102502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102502

Jamal, M. K., & Muqeem, M. (2023). An MCDM optimization based dynamic workflow scheduling used to handle priority tasks for fault tolerance in IIOT. Measurement: Sensors, 27(January), 100742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2023.100742

Kozlov, V., & Sałabun, W. (2021). Challenges in reliable solar panel selection using MCDA methods. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 4913–4923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.269

Kumar, A., & Pant, S. (2023). Analytical hierarchy process for sustainable agriculture: An overview. MethodsX, 10(October 2022), 101954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101954

Mamat, N. J. Z., & Daniel, J. K. (2007). Statistical analyses on time complexity and rank consistency between singular value decomposition and the duality approach in AHP: A case study of faculty member selection. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7–8), 1099–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.025

Masoomi, B., Sahebi, I. G., Fathi, M., Yıldırım, F., & Ghorbani, S. (2022a). Strategic supplier selection for renewable energy supply chain under green capabilities (fuzzy BWM-WASPAS-COPRAS approach). Energy Strategy Reviews, 40(January), 100815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100815

Masoomi, B., Sahebi, I. G., Fathi, M., Yıldırım, F., & Ghorbani, S. (2022b). Strategic supplier selection for renewable energy supply chain under green capabilities (fuzzy BWM-WASPAS-COPRAS approach). Energy Strategy Reviews, 40(January). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100815

Perec, A., & Radomska-Zalas, A. (2022). WASPAS Optimization in Advanced Manufacturing. Procedia Computer Science, 207, 1193–1200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.175

Radomska-Zalas, A. (2022). The AHP method in the optimization of the epoxidation of allylic alcohols. Procedia Computer Science, 207, 456–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.100

Sarkodie, W. O., Ofosu, E. A., & Ampimah, B. C. (2022). Decision optimization techniques for evaluating renewable energy resources for power generation in Ghana: MCDM approach. Energy Reports, 8, 13504–13513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.120

Shabani, A., Shabani, A., Ahmadinejad, B., & Salmasnia, A. (2022). Measuring the customer satisfaction of public transportation in Tehran during the COVID-19 pandemic using MCDM techniques. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(3), 1520–1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.05.009

Sotoudeh-Anvari, A. (2022). The applications of MCDM methods in COVID-19 pandemic: A state of the art review. Applied Soft Computing, 126, 109238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109238

Storme, T., Benoit, S., Van de Weghe, N., Mertens, L., Van Dyck, D., Brondeel, R., Witlox, F., Zwartjes, L., & Cardon, G. (2022). Citizen science and the potential for mobility policy – Introducing the Bike Barometer. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(3), 1539–1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.05.013

Swanzy-Impraim, E., Morris, J. E., Lummis, G. W., & Jones, A. (2023). Creativity and initial teacher education: Reflections of secondary visual arts teachers in Ghana. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 7(1), 100385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100385

Tadese, B., Wagari, M., & Tamiru, H. (2022). MCA and geospatial analysis-based suitable dumping site selection for urban environmental protection: A case study of Shambu, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Heliyon, 8(7), e09858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09858

Ul Islam, S. M., Khan, S., Ahmad, H., Ur Rahman, M. A., Tomar, S., & Khan, M. Z. (2022). Assessment of challenges and problems in supply chain among retailers during COVID-19 epidemic through AHP-TOPSIS hybrid MCDM technique. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 2(October), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2022.10.001

Wątróbski, J., Bączkiewicz, A., & Sałabun, W. (2022). Version [1.1]–[pyrepo-mcda — Reference Objects based MCDA Software Package]. SoftwareX, 19, 101197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2022.101197

Yunus, R. M., Samadi, Z., Yusop, N. M., & Omar, D. (2013). Expert Choice for Ranking Heritage Streets. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 101, 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.220

Downloads


Crossmark Updates

How to Cite

Akmaludin, A., Sihombing, E. G. ., Rinawati, R., Dewi, L. S. ., & Arisawati, E. . (2024). Integrated Selection of Permanent Teacher Appointments Recommended MCDM-AHP and WASPAS Methods. Sinkron : Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 8(2), 661-670. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i2.13063